2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualization of temporal differences between dominant perceptions in temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) and temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA) perceptions using dominance-highlighted TCATA (dTCATA) curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented here confirm that TDS and TCATA provide complementary information for the dynamic sensory characterization of regular and sodium-reduced foods; TCATA provides a more detailed description of concurrent sensory attributes perceived at a given time while TDS identifies the attributes catching assessors' attention, as discussed in previous studies [22,[33][34][35][36]38]. The dominant attributes, which discriminated more between regular and sodium-reduced foods than the concurrent perceived attributes, may be linked to consumer preference and choice of regular and sodium-reduced products as observed by Ares et al [34] or C. De Souza et al [22] for identification of product (dis)liking drivers based on TDS and TCATA profiles.…”
Section: Suggestions For Methods Selection and Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results presented here confirm that TDS and TCATA provide complementary information for the dynamic sensory characterization of regular and sodium-reduced foods; TCATA provides a more detailed description of concurrent sensory attributes perceived at a given time while TDS identifies the attributes catching assessors' attention, as discussed in previous studies [22,[33][34][35][36]38]. The dominant attributes, which discriminated more between regular and sodium-reduced foods than the concurrent perceived attributes, may be linked to consumer preference and choice of regular and sodium-reduced products as observed by Ares et al [34] or C. De Souza et al [22] for identification of product (dis)liking drivers based on TDS and TCATA profiles.…”
Section: Suggestions For Methods Selection and Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…TCATA is a more recent temporal method used to generate a continuous description of the sensory characteristics concurrently perceived in products [28,32]. TDS and TCATA have been compared across several product categories [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], but with limited application to regular and sodium-reduced foods [22,41]. The application of these temporal methods to highlight the impact of sodium reduction on the dynamic sensory profile of different product categories is warranted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidentally, tendencies of dominant attributes in the oral cavity may depend on time. To express time-varying characteristics, splitting TDS data into multiple time periods should be considered, as in several conventional studies (e.g., Dinnella et al 2013;Kawasaki et al 2019). Since change points of the time series can vary between individuals, it is further desirable to determine the change points for each panelist automatically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2013 ; Kawasaki et al. 2019 ). Since change points of the time series can vary between individuals, it is further desirable to determine the change points for each panelist automatically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TDS and TCATA have been reported to be suited for different purposes. TCATA has been reported to provide a more detailed description of how the sensory characteristics of products evolve over time (Esmerino et al, 2017;Ares et al, 2015;Kawasaki et al, 2019). On the contrary, TDS has been reported to be useful to identify the key attributes that catch consumers' attention throughout consumption (Alcaire et al, 2017b;Kawasaki et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%