2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.110.036804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing Atomic-Scale Negative Differential Resistance in Bilayer Graphene

Abstract: We investigate the atomic-scale tunneling characteristics of bilayer graphene on silicon carbide using the scanning tunneling microscopy. The high-resolution tunneling spectroscopy reveals an unexpected negative differential resistance (NDR) at the Dirac energy, which spatially varies within the single unit cell of bilayer graphene. The origin of NDR is explained by two near-gap van Hove singularities emerging in the electronic spectrum of bilayer graphene under a transverse electric field, which are strongly … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We see that although the charge on top layer keeps completely located over only one sublattice (nondimer B T ), the charge density over the bottom layer is mostly sublattice unpolarized, i.e., equally shared between the two sublattices. This interesting characteristic of these systems, which has already been point out in previous experimental [25], analytical [17,38], and numerical [42] works, can possibly explain why the current goes preferentially over the bottom layer.…”
Section: Role Of the Sublatticessupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We see that although the charge on top layer keeps completely located over only one sublattice (nondimer B T ), the charge density over the bottom layer is mostly sublattice unpolarized, i.e., equally shared between the two sublattices. This interesting characteristic of these systems, which has already been point out in previous experimental [25], analytical [17,38], and numerical [42] works, can possibly explain why the current goes preferentially over the bottom layer.…”
Section: Role Of the Sublatticessupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Therefore many devices based on these systems have been proposed recently, which involve the ability to control this layer pseudospin (the charge density polarization between layers induced by the bias) for different bias layouts [20][21][22], such as the creation of electron highways [23] or pseudospin-valve devices [4,5,24]. Experimentally, charge localization over different layers and different sublattices due to a bias voltage has been observed in * Corresponding author: carlos.gonzalez@fca.unicamp.br these systems by STM images [25], indicating the possibility of controlling layer and sublattice pseudospins in real samples. Even though all the attention that has been given to the possibilities of controlling charge densities in BLG through the bias, the charge flow has been neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that this typical contrast is not what is frequently mentioned as a √ 3 × √ 3 contrast, which has been observed in carbon nanotubes [43][44][45] as well as in graphene in the presence of extended defects. 46,47 FIG. 13.…”
Section: Application: Spatial Variation Of the Electronic Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a)] combined with magnetic-field-varied STS spectra which is generated by a substrate-induced interlayer potential [31][32][33]. The two lowenergy states are localized in different layers, resulting in the large asymmetry of their intensities [34,35]. The full width at half maximum of P1 is only ~3.4 meV, meaning that the conduction-band edge is almost flat.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%