“…Although the concept of potential negative effects of receiving too much information has been around for a long time (Blair, ), in the late 20th century scholars began to discuss, debate, and theorize the “information overload,” related stressors, and impacts on decision‐making that are frequently associated with the high flow of (certain types of) information in our current globalized digital era (e.g., Jacoby, Speller, & Berning, ; Tidline, ; Wilson, ; Wurman, ). Researchers across marketing, psychology, and social and information sciences have explored both technological and human responses to information overload, with varied findings related to the ways people use heuristics (Messner & Wänke, ) and explicitly cognitively (Hargittai, Neuman, & Curry, ; Miller, ) or technologically (Aljukhadar, Senecal, & Daoust, ; Mengis & Eppler, ; Sundar, Knobloch‐Westerwick, & Hastall, ) filter information for both work or everyday life purposes . In Koltay and colleagues' (2017) review of information overload mitigation responses, the authors found a mix in the literature to date between acceptance of the idea that nonspecialist information seekers and users “themselves had to become the gatekeepers” (p. 773) or mediators of information, and advocating the advancement of technological/professional solutions to aid in information management.…”