Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'05)
DOI: 10.1109/iv.2005.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing Query Occurrence in Search Result Lists

Abstract: The result lists of popular web search engines represent retrieved documents with a title, a brief textual summary and a URL. Wepresent a novel approach that incorporates visualization into the conventional search result interface. For each resulting document, occurrences of the entire are concisely depicted in the form of a small, document-shaped icon. An participant user study was carried out to compare our design with the traditional search result list in terms of accuracy and task performance. Though stati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results above and below the focused item only display the title and the URL. We also considered the possibility of dynamically altering the content of the results, for example, by using representative key phrases instead of text captions [31], using caption texts of varying lengths [32], using different text processing schemes when constructing the content of the captions [33], or visualizing the occurrences of the query terms in the result document (e.g., [34,35]). These alternatives were ultimately discarded during the design process to avoid overloading the interface with new features in this initial stage of exploring the design space.…”
Section: Mobile Cluster-based Search Interface Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results above and below the focused item only display the title and the URL. We also considered the possibility of dynamically altering the content of the results, for example, by using representative key phrases instead of text captions [31], using caption texts of varying lengths [32], using different text processing schemes when constructing the content of the captions [33], or visualizing the occurrences of the query terms in the result document (e.g., [34,35]). These alternatives were ultimately discarded during the design process to avoid overloading the interface with new features in this initial stage of exploring the design space.…”
Section: Mobile Cluster-based Search Interface Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work by Heiman and Jhaveri [46], a sm all document shaped icon is presented on the left side of t he result item. This icon contains four equal sized rows representing document sections (independent of document size) .…”
Section: \J I'imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Turetken and Sharda [20], web documents can be visualized based on content (e.g., title and term frequency) [4,9,10,14,16,23], connectivity (e.g., number of incoming and outgoing links), and others (e.g., metadata like document size and the web domain) [4,10]. Our AspecTiles falls into the first category, as it visualizes the relevance of each retrieved web page with respect to each displayed aspect.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%