Visually Perceived Distance Judgments: Tablet-Based Augmented Reality Versus the Real World

Abstract

Does visually perceived distance differ when objects are viewed in augmented reality (AR), as opposed to the real world? What are the differences? These questions are theoretically interesting, and the answers are important for the development of many tablet-and phone-based AR applications, including mobile AR navigation systems. This paper presents a thorough literature review of distance judgment experimental protocols, and results from several areas of perceptual psychology. In addition to distance judgments of real and virtual objects, this section also discusses previous work in measuring the geometry of virtual picture space, and considers how this work might be relevant to tablet AR.Then, the results of two experiments are presented, where observers bisected egocentric distances of 15 and 30 meters in tablet-based AR and in the real world, in indoor corridor and outdoor field environments. In AR, observers bisected the distances to virtual humans, while in the real world, they bisected the distances to real humans. This is the first reported research that directly compares distance judgments of real and virtual objects in a tablet AR system. Four key findings were: (1) In AR, observers expanded midpoint intervals at 15 meters, but compressed midpoints at 30 meters. (2) Observers were accurate in the real world. (3) The environmental setting-corridor or open field-had no effect.(4) The picture perception literature is important in understanding how distances are likely judged in tablet-based AR. Taken together, these findings suggest the depth distortions that AR application developers should expect with mobile and especially tablet-based AR.

Survey on depth perception in head mounted displays: distance estimation in virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality

“…Different studies conducted on depth perception in AR used different methods to measure distance perception. Swan et al [43] employed walking tasks to measure distance perception. A comparison between distance measurements of virtual objects and real objects was performed and the results showed a significant distance estimation difference.…”

Depth perception in shuffleboard: Depth cues effect on depth perception in virtual and augmented reality system

“…The perceptual matching tasks conducted in the depth perception research involve verbal answer, perceptual matching, and walking task. Walking tasks (eg, Ii et al, and Kirkley) typically have a user walk to or toward a previously seen target (eg, blind walking, imagined blind walking, or triangulation by walking). In verbal reports, a subject verbally reports the depth of virtual objects or comparison between two perceived locations .…”

A Registration Framework for the Comparison of Video and Optical See-Through Devices in Interactive Augmented Reality

“…AR Perception in Extrapersonal space (medium distances, up to about 30m) and Vista space (large distances) related to respectively motion/navigation and general context/orientation, is currently less explored, as most AR applications (with the exception of handheld AR, e.g. [16]) are often indoor and at close distances. AR HMDs have to render different views for each eye to convey binocular disparity, which are approximately spaced by an interpupillary distance (IPD) of 63 mm [17].…”