2019
DOI: 10.21608/geget.2019.67042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D level in nephrotic syndrome, Factors of impact?

Abstract: Introduction Nephrotic syndrome (NS) usually responds to steroid therapy; however, the majority of children relapse, resulting in prolonged and repeated courses of steroid therapy. Vitamin D is a vital component of bone metabolism and calcium homeostasis. Maintenance of adequate levels of vitamin D is recommended to maintain good bone health and other organ systems of NS patients. The study aimed to assess serum 25 (OH) D levels in children with NS, compare its level with healthy age and sex-matched controls a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On pairwise comparison, the difference is significant between steroid-resistant anddependent, where steroid-resistant patients had lower vitamin D level followed by steroid-dependent then steroid-sensitive patients. This agrees with Marzouk et al (20) who reported that vitamin D was significantly lower in those with steroid-resistant NS. A crosssectional study done by Weng et al (10) who measured 25(OH) D in children with SRNS, SSNS and healthy controls and showed marked vitamin D deficiency in SRNS than SSNS and controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On pairwise comparison, the difference is significant between steroid-resistant anddependent, where steroid-resistant patients had lower vitamin D level followed by steroid-dependent then steroid-sensitive patients. This agrees with Marzouk et al (20) who reported that vitamin D was significantly lower in those with steroid-resistant NS. A crosssectional study done by Weng et al (10) who measured 25(OH) D in children with SRNS, SSNS and healthy controls and showed marked vitamin D deficiency in SRNS than SSNS and controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There was statistically significant difference between the case and control groups regarding serum vitamin D (Median level 13.6 ng/mL within case group versus 37.1 ng/mL within control group). This comes in harmony with a previous study by ElKersh et al (9) , Marzouk et al (20) , Nielsen et al (21) and Elsaeed et al (19) . Moreover, Selewski et al (5) reported that all children with NS at diagnosis had 25(OH)D deficiency and the majority continued to have a deficiency at 2-4 months and that supplemental vitamin D decreased the odds of 25(OH)D deficiency at follow-up supporting a role for supplementation in incident NS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24,25 In children with NS, a greater extent of the decline in serum vitamin D level was noted in SRNS as compared to SSNS suggesting that the severity of uVDBP losses is more prominent in SRNS than in SSNS. [26][27][28] In that regard, the uVDBP levels were assessed in SRNS and SSNS patients from India and the United States (US) and significantly higher concentrations were reported in SRNS as compared to SSNS. 29,30 However, SSNS subjects with proteinuria on urinalysis showed a higher trend of uVDBP levels than that in SSNS cases without proteinuria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%