2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VLT/X-Shooter survey of near-infrared diffuse interstellar bands

Abstract: Context. The unknown identity of the diffuse interstellar band (DIB) carriers poses one of the longest standing unresolved problems in astrophysics. While the presence, properties, and behaviour of hundreds of optical DIBs between 4000 Å and 9000 Å have been well established, information on DIBs in both the ultra-violet and near-infrared (NIR) ranges is limited. Aims. In this paper, we present a spectral survey of the NIR range, from 0.9 µm to 2.5 µm. Our observations were designed to detect new DIBs, confirm … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
100
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
10
100
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our use of bright, often nearby targets may explain that our average width is less affected by cloud velocity dispersion and is closer to the intrinsic width. Gaussian fits to the averaged λλ15617 and 15673 profiles provide FHWM= 4.2 and 3.1 Å, respectively, which corresponds to the maxima in their histograms in Table 3 lists all published DIB detections and candidates in the APOGEE wavelength range (except for the strong λ15273 DIB), based on the earlier works (Geballe et al 2011;Cox et al 2014). For all bands the number of detections is very small and some are quite uncertain.…”
Section: Dib Widths and Shapesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our use of bright, often nearby targets may explain that our average width is less affected by cloud velocity dispersion and is closer to the intrinsic width. Gaussian fits to the averaged λλ15617 and 15673 profiles provide FHWM= 4.2 and 3.1 Å, respectively, which corresponds to the maxima in their histograms in Table 3 lists all published DIB detections and candidates in the APOGEE wavelength range (except for the strong λ15273 DIB), based on the earlier works (Geballe et al 2011;Cox et al 2014). For all bands the number of detections is very small and some are quite uncertain.…”
Section: Dib Widths and Shapesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Here we focus on the three other, weaker bands. Based on the few available detections (Geballe et al 2011;Cox et al 2014), we expect them to be between two and three times fainter than the band at λ15273. The first part of this paper aims at creating a catalog of equivalent widths and central wavelengths for these three strongestweak DIBs.…”
Section: Catalog Of λλ15617 15653 and 15673 Dibsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Galazutdinov et al 2000;Hobbs et al 2009). Most of them are seen in the optical, with some additional DIBs clearly identified in the near infrared (Joblin et al 1990;Foing & Ehrenfreund 1994;Cox et al 2014;Hamano et al 2016) and a few proposed candidates in the near-UV (Bhatt & Cami 2015). Also, DIBs seem omnipresent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first near-infrared (NIR) DIB was discovered by Joblin et al (1990). Currently, ∼25 NIR DIBs have been identified (Foing & Ehrenfreund 1994;Geballe et al 2011;Cox et al 2014;Hamano et al 2015Hamano et al , 2016, including the strong band at 1.318 μm. NIR DIBs are particularly useful since they allow to make use of highly reddened target stars and explore the densest areas of the interstellar medium (ISM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%