Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Virtual Machines and Intermediate Languages 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1711506.1711512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VM performance evaluation with functional models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, JVMs have an interpreter equipped with a dynamic compiler that performs an optimized compilation of the parts of the program that are most frequently used . Notwithstanding, this poses several challenges when benchmarking Java codes due to ‘noise’ being added by these mechanisms: Performance evaluation in JVMs is difficult because they act as an abstraction layer, which could change results across different runs. Different Java compilers make different optimizations. Some compilers might detect dead code (code not affecting the output) and delete it.…”
Section: Experiments Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, JVMs have an interpreter equipped with a dynamic compiler that performs an optimized compilation of the parts of the program that are most frequently used . Notwithstanding, this poses several challenges when benchmarking Java codes due to ‘noise’ being added by these mechanisms: Performance evaluation in JVMs is difficult because they act as an abstraction layer, which could change results across different runs. Different Java compilers make different optimizations. Some compilers might detect dead code (code not affecting the output) and delete it.…”
Section: Experiments Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%