2020
DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2020.1769614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VOD service providers and regulation in the European Union: an audiovisual diversity approach

Abstract: A firm step in order to impose a quota for the catalogues of video-on-demand service providers has been given by the EU through the amendment of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive in 2018. This paper aims to analyse the potential implications of this change, in relation to the way the promotion of European works has been implemented so far, since some comments can be made in light of this revision. It will be argued that more interesting than the obligation to comply with a quota, defined by the geograph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the reach of Netflix is not global, with no service in China, Syria, Crimea and North Korea, and 'is predicated on access to high-speed broadband, a functional computer, electricity and money to regularly pay subscriptions, further limiting its scope to the global elites' (Jenner, 2018: 190). Furthermore, the streaming service still needs to operate within a national media ecology, with regulatory laws and licensing agreements restricting access to local markets, thus making catalogues specific to each country (García Leiva and Albornoz, 2020;Lobato, 2019). Taking this into account, Netflix becomes framed as a transnational player, which affects and connects to different local, national, regional and global aspects of the television industry (Straubhaar et al, 2019;Jenner, 2018).…”
Section: The Need For Brand and Catalogue Localisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reach of Netflix is not global, with no service in China, Syria, Crimea and North Korea, and 'is predicated on access to high-speed broadband, a functional computer, electricity and money to regularly pay subscriptions, further limiting its scope to the global elites' (Jenner, 2018: 190). Furthermore, the streaming service still needs to operate within a national media ecology, with regulatory laws and licensing agreements restricting access to local markets, thus making catalogues specific to each country (García Leiva and Albornoz, 2020;Lobato, 2019). Taking this into account, Netflix becomes framed as a transnational player, which affects and connects to different local, national, regional and global aspects of the television industry (Straubhaar et al, 2019;Jenner, 2018).…”
Section: The Need For Brand and Catalogue Localisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, in May 2018, regarding the German case, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has rejected the lawsuit from Netflix following a complaint about the payment of a fee to the Federal Film Board. According to the ECJ, due to the fact that the Californian VOD platform's content is available in Germany, Netflix is obliged to contribute to the national film fund (Albornoz and Leiva, 2020).…”
Section: Regulate or Not Regulate In The Age Of Covid-19 Global Pandemic?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this background, the most decisive step towards intervening in the configuration of the catalogues of SVOD services was taken by the EU: the 2018 reformulated Audiovisual Media Service Directive, which is being transposed into national legal systems, imposes the obligation for VOD catalogues to contain a minimum of 30% content of European origin. In addition, the directive established the need for European titles to have prominence within the services (García Leiva and Albornoz, 2021).…”
Section: Research and Debatementioning
confidence: 99%