2017
DOI: 10.1121/1.4988444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice gender release from masking in cochlear implant users is correlated with binaural pitch fusion

Abstract: Spatial and voice gender separation of target from masking speech leads to substantial release from masking in normal-hearing listeners. However, binaural pitch fusion is often broad in cochlear implant (CI) listeners, such that dichotic stimuli with pitches differing by up to 3-4 octaves are fused (Reiss et al., 2014). We hypothesized that broad binaural fusion could reduce a listener’s ability to separate competing speech streams with different voice pitches, and thus reduce the voice gender as well as spati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in voice characteristics between talkers of different genders lead to greater masking release than differences in voice characteristics between talkers of the same gender (e.g., Brungart, 2001 ; Brungart et al , 2001 ; Ericson et al , 2004 ). Oh and Reiss (2017) referred to this benefit as “voice gender release from masking” (VGRM), where “gender” denotes the classical categorization of a talker's voice with their assigned sex at birth. In those investigations, when the target and masker talkers were different genders, percent correct target identification was 15%–20% points higher than conditions with same-gender talker and maskers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in voice characteristics between talkers of different genders lead to greater masking release than differences in voice characteristics between talkers of the same gender (e.g., Brungart, 2001 ; Brungart et al , 2001 ; Ericson et al , 2004 ). Oh and Reiss (2017) referred to this benefit as “voice gender release from masking” (VGRM), where “gender” denotes the classical categorization of a talker's voice with their assigned sex at birth. In those investigations, when the target and masker talkers were different genders, percent correct target identification was 15%–20% points higher than conditions with same-gender talker and maskers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Oh and Reiss (2017) (11) investigations, when the target and masker talkers were different genders, percent correct target identification was 15% -20% points higher than conditions with same-gender talker and maskers. Also, there is significant difference between all age subgroups in all conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Here, the improvement they can provide for speech segregation is referred to as “release from masking.” Specifically, the release from masking by the cues from vocal-characteristic differences is termed “voice-gender release from masking” (VGRM), and the masking release by spatial separation cues is termed “spatial release from masking” (SRM). It should be noted that the term VGRM was originally proposed in the study by Oh and Reiss, 2017a , b and used in their other studies ( Oh et al, 2021 , 2022 ). Here, “gender” denotes the classical categorization of a talker’s voice with their assigned sex at birth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%