2016
DOI: 10.1177/1367006915589424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice onset time and global foreign accent in German–French simultaneous bilinguals during adulthood

Abstract: Aims and objectives:In this study, we investigated crosslinguistic influence in the phonetic systems of simultaneous bilinguals (2L1s) during adulthood. Methodology: Specifically, we analyzed the voice onset time (VOT) of the voiceless stop /k/ in the spontaneous speech of 14 German-French bilinguals who grew up in France or Germany. We looked at both languages, first comparing the groups, second comparing their VOT to their global accent. Data and analysis: The material consisted of interviews, lasting for ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
29
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
29
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These advantages seem to be limited to phonological categories rather than structural ones and are evident in both perception, such as differentiation of minimal pairs (Hyltenstam, Bylund, Abrahamsson, & Park, ), and production, for instance, with respect to the production of voice onset time and accent rating (Au, Knightly, Jun, & Oh, ; but see Ventureyra, Pallier, & Yoo, , for null results). Despite these long‐lasting advantages over L2 learners, heritage speakers are usually perceived as sounding less nativelike in comparison to monolinguals (Kupisch et al., ), and the acoustic properties for some aspects of their speech (i.e., voice onset time in production of stops) are not always nativelike (Lein, Kupisch, & van de Weijer, ). With respect to voice onset time specifically, one likely cause of the changes in L1 values for this temporal characteristic of stop production has been suggested to be crosslinguistic influence, a process that might lead to the development of an accented L1 (Lein et al., ).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advantages seem to be limited to phonological categories rather than structural ones and are evident in both perception, such as differentiation of minimal pairs (Hyltenstam, Bylund, Abrahamsson, & Park, ), and production, for instance, with respect to the production of voice onset time and accent rating (Au, Knightly, Jun, & Oh, ; but see Ventureyra, Pallier, & Yoo, , for null results). Despite these long‐lasting advantages over L2 learners, heritage speakers are usually perceived as sounding less nativelike in comparison to monolinguals (Kupisch et al., ), and the acoustic properties for some aspects of their speech (i.e., voice onset time in production of stops) are not always nativelike (Lein, Kupisch, & van de Weijer, ). With respect to voice onset time specifically, one likely cause of the changes in L1 values for this temporal characteristic of stop production has been suggested to be crosslinguistic influence, a process that might lead to the development of an accented L1 (Lein et al., ).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Duanmu (2000: 24f) In French, voicing lead with negative VOTs characterizes voiced stops /b d ɡ/, and short voicing lag (with VOT values defined as < 30ms) characterizes voiceless stops /p t k/. Lein et al (2016) summarize ten previous studies on French with voiceless plosives. For /t/, they report a range of VOTs between 18 and 35 ms, and for /k/ between 32 and 49, suggesting substantially lower values than those reported for German.…”
Section: Vot In French German and Mandarin Chinesementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist three different types of VOT: distinction between stressed and unstressed syllables been made (cf. Lein et al 2016 for discussion). More recent studies suggest much higher VOTs.…”
Section: Vot In French German and Mandarin Chinesementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research examining the influence of extra-linguistic factors has focused on those who have acquired an L2 later in life while residing in an L2-speaking environment (see Colantoni et al, 2015, andPiske et al, 2001 for reviews) or on heritage language speakers (e.g., McCarthy et al, 2013McCarthy et al, , 2014Nagy, 2015;Lein et al, 2016;Mayr and Siddika, 2018), while the factors influencing speech production in simultaneous or early bilingual speakers residing in areas with long-standing societal or regional bilingualism have received far less research attention. The few available studies suggest that extra-linguistic factors may also influence phonetic variation among simultaneous or early bilingual speakers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%