2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2696056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice Pathology Detection and Classification Using Auto-Correlation and Entropy Features in Different Frequency Regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several existing solutions in the field of pathological speech detection [9,10]. For example, Al-Nasheri et al in their work [11] concentrated on developing feature extraction for the detection and classification of voice pathologies by investigating different frequency bands using autocorrelation and entropy. The voice impairment cases studied were caused by vocal cysts, vocal polyps, and vocal paralysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several existing solutions in the field of pathological speech detection [9,10]. For example, Al-Nasheri et al in their work [11] concentrated on developing feature extraction for the detection and classification of voice pathologies by investigating different frequency bands using autocorrelation and entropy. The voice impairment cases studied were caused by vocal cysts, vocal polyps, and vocal paralysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36,17,26], etc. From the voice pathologies point of view, most researchers restricted the dataset to a limited set of pathologies [7,43,14,25,51,44,5,3,4,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, al-Nasheri et al [11] used the SVD and MEEI databases and used the autocorrelation and entropy parameters for the detection and classification of pathologies, obtaining respectively 99.96% and 92.79% accuracy for MEEI and SVD.…”
Section: Discussion and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression where true negative (TN) can be explained as follows: the system detects a normal subject as a normal subject, while the true positive (TP) means that the system detects a pathological subject as a pathological subject, besides the false negative (FN) means that the system detects a pathological issue as a normal subject and ultimately false positives (FP) means that the system detects a normal subject matter as a pathological subject. [11] The extracted parameters from the two different databases must be checked in the detection and classification processes.…”
Section: The Noise To Harmonics Ratio Combined With Detrendedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation