Voices, Hierarchies and Spaces: Reconfiguring the Women's Movement in Democratic South Africa

Abstract

This article explores the ways in which the contemporary women's movement in South Africa has been shaped by its own recent history as well as by the changes in the political landscape since 1994. The article argues that the striking feature of the past decade is the manner in which the strategy of inclusion of women in formal political institutions of state and party has tended to displace the transformatory goals of structural and social change. Both goals, of inclusion and transformation, were held to be mutually dependent by women's movement activists throughout the 1980s and 1990s. However, the article shows that maintaining the strategic balance between these goals has been difficult to achieve, in large part because the women's movement has been relatively weak, apart from a brief moment in the early 1990s. The argument outlines the theoretical and strategic debates relating to definitions of the term 'women's movement' in South Africa, and then identifies and classifies different forms of organizations and strategies. Finally, the article argues that the realization of gender equality rests on the extent to which a strong women's movement will develop, with a clear agenda for transformation and relative autonomy from both state and other social movements.This article seeks to understand the ways in which the contemporary women's movement in South Africa has been shaped by its own recent history as well as by the changes in the political landscape since 1994. Within this landscape of democracy, I am centrally concerned with exploring the voices in which women's organizations are speaking, and the strategies they have employed to negotiate power and interests vis-à-vis the state and other social movements (that is, the spaces occupied by the women's movement and the hierarchies within it). Drawing on a larger body of research (Hassim, 2005;, I argue that the striking feature of the past decade is the manner in which the strategy of inclusion of women in formal political institutions of state and party has

Decentralizing Government and Decentering Gender: Lessons from Local Government Reform in South Africa

“…linked these to issues of the pernicious gender division of labour.' 59 The major difference between local organization during the apartheid era and transition and the situation since is that in the earlier period there was the hope and expectation that women's involvement and organization could be scaled up and that it would amount to something for women. This is no longer the case as Hassim has pointed out: Moesoetsa confirms that women continue to be organised at community level and that they are animated by issues related to service delivery.…”

2 - Developmental Local Government in Post-Apartheid South Africa? A Feminist Rethinking of the State and Development in the Context of Neo-liberalism

“…To date they have largely focussed on fighting cut-offs and evictions, and have made few real attempts to envision and advocate for an alternative approach to governance. Moreover, as has been widely observed, despite the fact that women comprise the majority of members within the anti-privatisation community organisations, they have failed to take up gender issues in any meaningful way (Pointer 2004;Hassim 2004;Beall 2005). Whilst this struggle may be a long and difficult one, by addressing internal gender issues and implementing feminist democracy within their own organisations the movements would begin the important process of developing the capacities required to help mount the struggle for a new form of the developmental state in South Africa.…”

New directions or half measures? Organisational response to gender inequity in the South African Police Service

“…was considered sufficient financial support. In her study of the South African women's movement, Hassim (2005) suggests that in situations where gender reform initiatives are top-down driven and under-resourced, gains are more easily made where women can be targeted as a specific category (quotas, for example), while issues in which the relationships between women and men need to be addressed (for example, sexual harassment) are harder to define and passed over.…”