1994
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(94)90087-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Void fraction along a vertical heated rod bundle under flow stagnation conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qazi et al [6,7] adopted a standard gamma ray attenuation technique to measure the chordal void fraction in the pipe and rod bundles along the axial development. However, the void feature near the wall was missing.…”
Section: Gamma Ray Attenuation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Qazi et al [6,7] adopted a standard gamma ray attenuation technique to measure the chordal void fraction in the pipe and rod bundles along the axial development. However, the void feature near the wall was missing.…”
Section: Gamma Ray Attenuation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate these methods, the safety and cost must be considered in advance. The gamma ray attenuation technique [6][7][8], neutron radiography [9][10][11], and fast neutron scattering method [12] are too expensive compared with other methods, and they are dangerous if the ray irradiates the human body. Secondly, the response time is emphasized for the rapid change of phase distribution in two-phase flow, which indicates that only electrical methods (SCVS [5,19,20], multi-sensor probe [21], and electrical impedance void meter [21]) can capture the dynamic features of the void fraction in rod bundles.…”
Section: Electrical Impedance Void Metermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the two-phase mixture level swell, researchers have conducted two-phase flow experiments in stagnant water (Osakabe et al, 1984;Suzuki and Murase, 1986;Kataoka et al, 1987;Kamei et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2012). Boiling experiments also have been conducted to evaluate the void fraction and actual water level during boil-off condition when water level drops due to evaporation (Shires et al, 1980;Seedy and Muralidoran, 1982;Anklam and Miller, 1983;Kumamaru et al, 1994;Qazi et al, 1994). However, those studies mainly focused on the void fraction and height of the two-phase mixture level; not enough is known about two-phase mixture level swell, such as the fluctuation amplitude of the two-phase mixture level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in the event of an accident that the water level in a reactor falls under low-flow velocity or pool conditions, the boiling two-phase flow pattern is complicated due to the rapid increase in void fraction and vapor bubble coalescence. For example, void-fraction and rod-temperature distributions during the boil-off process in the reactor core were obtained by system-integral tests conducted by Anoda et al (1990) and Lee et al (1999) and individual effect tests conducted by Anklam et al (1982), Pearson et al (1984), Aksan et al (1993), Kondo et al (1993) and Qazi et al (1994). An axial void fraction distribution is usually acquired by differential-pressure gages as a volume-averaged value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%