2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatile degassing, petrology, and magma dynamics of the Villarrica Lava Lake, Southern Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
133
3
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
133
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a trigger has been described previously as a typical mechanism for the generation of lava fountains and is known in the literature as the "foam collapse model" (Jaupart and Vergniolle, 1989), as opposed to the "rise-speed-dependent model" (Parfitt, 2004), which assumes that an eruption is triggered by syneruptive bubble exsolution accompanying magma rising in the conduit as the volume fraction of bubbles exceeds that of maximum packing. The higher SiO 2 content of lava lake products may be explained by convective conduit dynamics (Witter et al, 2004) during pre-eruptive (years to days) and post-paroxysmal (i.e., days and months after 3 March 2015 eruption) stages, where bubbly flow controls the bursting of lava lake and magma degassing ( Figure 6A). The progressive increase of geophysical signals (i.e., increasing seismicity, thermal anomalies and rising of CO 2 /SO 2 degassing) together with the rise of lava lake and Strombolian activity is interpreted as a higher participation of primitive magma within the conduit and a slug flow type volatile transport on 2 March 2015 ( Figure 6B).…”
Section: Conduit Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a trigger has been described previously as a typical mechanism for the generation of lava fountains and is known in the literature as the "foam collapse model" (Jaupart and Vergniolle, 1989), as opposed to the "rise-speed-dependent model" (Parfitt, 2004), which assumes that an eruption is triggered by syneruptive bubble exsolution accompanying magma rising in the conduit as the volume fraction of bubbles exceeds that of maximum packing. The higher SiO 2 content of lava lake products may be explained by convective conduit dynamics (Witter et al, 2004) during pre-eruptive (years to days) and post-paroxysmal (i.e., days and months after 3 March 2015 eruption) stages, where bubbly flow controls the bursting of lava lake and magma degassing ( Figure 6A). The progressive increase of geophysical signals (i.e., increasing seismicity, thermal anomalies and rising of CO 2 /SO 2 degassing) together with the rise of lava lake and Strombolian activity is interpreted as a higher participation of primitive magma within the conduit and a slug flow type volatile transport on 2 March 2015 ( Figure 6B).…”
Section: Conduit Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of the involved (over)pressure is calculated by applying Archimedes' principle, which assumes the mass of the fluid displaced (Δρ V in ), times gravity acceleration (g), divided by the (ascending) conduit area. We take the density difference Δρ between degassed (descending) and gas-rich (ascending) magma to range from 70 to 120 kg m À3 [Witter et al, 2004;Huppert and Hallworth, 2007].…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of plagioclase-melt phase equilibria proposed by Housh and Luhr [1991] has often been used to estimate preeruptive meltwater contents [e.g., Self and King, 1996;Luhr, 2002;Kaneko et al, 2007]. The MELTS model [Ghiorso and Sack, 1995] is also effective in constraining meltwater contents in magmas with anhydrous phenocryst assemblages [e.g., Witter et al, 2004;Larsen, 2006].…”
Section: A21 Phase Equilibrium Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%