2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2008.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatiles retained in icy surfaces dominated by CO2 after energy inputs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also studied the desorption rate as function of temperature and found that CO 2 released some CO near 𝑇 = 40 K (corresponding to the CO sublimation temperature and likely representing desorption of CO deposited on the surface of the CO 2 ice rather than authentic segregation). They found that low-level emission of CO took place at 45-70 K, and that most CO was released during CO 2 sublimation that peaked at 80 K. It is interesting to compare these results with similar experiments for CH 4 (Luna et al 2008) and N 2 (Satorre et al 2009) entrapped in CO 2 . Both species have a first desorption peak near 𝑇 = 50 K (corresponding to CH 4 and N 2 sublimation), a second broad desorption peak at 𝑇 = 80-90 K (attributed to the removal of porosity in the CO 2 host), and a third peak centred at 𝑇 = 95-100 K during CO 2 sublimation.…”
Section: Release Of Co From Comentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They also studied the desorption rate as function of temperature and found that CO 2 released some CO near 𝑇 = 40 K (corresponding to the CO sublimation temperature and likely representing desorption of CO deposited on the surface of the CO 2 ice rather than authentic segregation). They found that low-level emission of CO took place at 45-70 K, and that most CO was released during CO 2 sublimation that peaked at 80 K. It is interesting to compare these results with similar experiments for CH 4 (Luna et al 2008) and N 2 (Satorre et al 2009) entrapped in CO 2 . Both species have a first desorption peak near 𝑇 = 50 K (corresponding to CH 4 and N 2 sublimation), a second broad desorption peak at 𝑇 = 80-90 K (attributed to the removal of porosity in the CO 2 host), and a third peak centred at 𝑇 = 95-100 K during CO 2 sublimation.…”
Section: Release Of Co From Comentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, the conditions within icy minor Solar System bodies are different from the interstellar conditions studied by Cooke et al (2018). Firstly, the relevant temperatures are higher and the porosity of CO 2 ice decreases drastically with increasing temperature (Satorre et al 2009). The smaller presence of pores at higher temperatures may strongly reduce the diffusivity and result in a much higher 𝐸 seg -value.…”
Section: Release Of Co From Comentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been argued that the production rates of CO and C 2 H 2 (Luspay- Kuti et al 2015), in addition to CH 4 , HCN, and H 2 S (Gasc et al 2017), are all correlated with that of CO 2 . Laboratory experiments likewise confirm that CO 2 is capable of trapping hyper-volatiles (Luna et al 2008;Satorre et al 2009;Simon et al 2019). This could be consistent with CO 2 being the source of these molecules.…”
Section: Modifications By Occluded Super-volatilesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, the study of mixtures where water is the main component has been addressed by several authors and typically all these molecules behave in a similar way, presenting two main desorption peaks: a first peak corresponding to its own desorption energy and an additional peak when this molecule desorbs simultaneously with water (Collings et al 2004;Martín-Doménech et al 2014). This retaining behavior is not exclusive of a polar molecule like water but is also observed for other nonpolar molecules, e.g., carbon dioxide (Satorre et al 2009). Calculations of desorption energy are necessary to interpret desorption processes occurring in many astrophysical scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%