2005
DOI: 10.3386/w11188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatility Forecasting

Abstract: Volatility has been one of the most active and successful areas of research in time series econometrics and economic forecasting in recent decades. This chapter provides a selective survey of the most important theoretical developments and empirical insights to emerge from this burgeoning literature, with a distinct focus on forecasting applications. Volatility is inherently latent, and Section 1 begins with a brief intuitive account of various key volatility concepts. Section 2 then discusses a series of diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
(270 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, instability in the second moment of financial and macroeconomic data is often quite persistent (e.g., Bollerslev, Engle, and Nelson (1994) and Andersen, Bollerslev, Christoffersen, and Diebold (2007), Balke and Gordon (1989), Kim and Nelson (1999), and McConnell and Perez-Quiros (2000)), so it is interesting to ask whether second moments of u t exhibit enough low-frequency variability to invalidate limits like those shown in Table I. To investigate this, we nest each of the models considered thus far in a more general model that allows for such low-frequency heteroskedasticity, derive the resulting value of Σ for the more general model, and construct an optimal test against such alternatives.…”
Section: Testing For Low-frequency Heteroskedasticity In U Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, instability in the second moment of financial and macroeconomic data is often quite persistent (e.g., Bollerslev, Engle, and Nelson (1994) and Andersen, Bollerslev, Christoffersen, and Diebold (2007), Balke and Gordon (1989), Kim and Nelson (1999), and McConnell and Perez-Quiros (2000)), so it is interesting to ask whether second moments of u t exhibit enough low-frequency variability to invalidate limits like those shown in Table I. To investigate this, we nest each of the models considered thus far in a more general model that allows for such low-frequency heteroskedasticity, derive the resulting value of Σ for the more general model, and construct an optimal test against such alternatives.…”
Section: Testing For Low-frequency Heteroskedasticity In U Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volatility forecasting is an active research area and has significant implications for financial market practitioners. Andersen et al (2005) and Poon and Granger (2003) are two recent extensive surveys on the subject. 12 Strictly speaking, the volatility of a stock index is an unobservable parameter that determines the index's observed variations.…”
Section: An Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 See Bollerslev, Engle & Nelson (1995) or Andersen, Bollerslev, Christoffersen & Diebold (2005) for surveys of the large literature on volatility modeling.…”
Section: Variance Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%