2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltage-Driven Translocation of DNA through a High Throughput Conical Solid-State Nanopore

Abstract: Nanopores have become an important tool for molecule detection at single molecular level. With the development of fabrication technology, synthesized solid-state membranes are promising candidate substrates in respect of their exceptional robustness and controllable size and shape. Here, a 30–60 (tip-base) nm conical nanopore fabricated in 100 nm thick silicon nitride (Si3N4) membrane by focused ion beam (FIB) has been employed for the analysis of λ-DNA translocations at different voltage biases from 200 to 45… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The threading of ssDNA or dsDNA into biological nanopores is often observed above a threshold potential333435363738 (Supplementary Fig. S3) that can be tuned by altering the charge distribution of the lumen of the pore or by changing the ionic strength of the solution2739.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threading of ssDNA or dsDNA into biological nanopores is often observed above a threshold potential333435363738 (Supplementary Fig. S3) that can be tuned by altering the charge distribution of the lumen of the pore or by changing the ionic strength of the solution2739.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been suggested in solid-state nanopores to slow DNA translocation speed including the use of stick-slip interactions by using dielectric materials with high surface charge density like Al 2 O 3 and HfO 2 . [28,29] Other proposed techniques include the use of different ionic solutions such as LiCl, [30] increasing solution viscosity with glycerol, [31] optoelectronic control, [32] fluidic gating, [33] reducing nanopore diameter, [34] use of pressure gradients, [35] thicker membranes, [36] and temporary hydrogen bonding. [37] Recently, the potential for DNA–graphene hydrophobic interactions to induce ssDNA translocations in single-nucleotide steps was discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed an average translocation time ~ 125 ms for 22 nt ssDNA in Al2O3-coated PET nanopores (half cone angle ~ 9 ± 2 o , diameter 8 nm, applied voltage 400mV). Due to confinement effects and electrostatic interactions, translocation times of DNA molecules (and other small molecules) through small-diameter (and/or charged) nanopores are well-modeled as activated processes [52][53][54][55] . As the electric field 0 pulls the stalled DNA into the pore with a force 0 , where is the effective charge of the molecule, translocation times decrease exponentially with the field in such activated entries, reducing the barrier by a factor ΔG~∫ 0 0 associated to the work done by the applied field to move the DNA molecule a distance 53,54 .…”
Section: Field Leakage Induced Delay Of Dna Translocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to confinement effects and electrostatic interactions, translocation times of DNA molecules (and other small molecules) through small-diameter (and/or charged) nanopores are well-modeled as activated processes [52][53][54][55] . As the electric field 0 pulls the stalled DNA into the pore with a force 0 , where is the effective charge of the molecule, translocation times decrease exponentially with the field in such activated entries, reducing the barrier by a factor ΔG~∫ 0 0 associated to the work done by the applied field to move the DNA molecule a distance 53,54 . Translocation times can then be estimated through 0 −∆ / , where τ0 is the zero-field translocation time, kB is Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature of the system [52][53][54] .…”
Section: Field Leakage Induced Delay Of Dna Translocationmentioning
confidence: 99%