2018 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/isgteurope.2018.8571850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltage-Free Distance Protection Method for Closed Loop Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in Pandakov and Hoidalen (2017), a compensation scheme to omit errors due to impedances of faults and infeed currents was suggested. Biller and Jaeger (2018) proposed a voltage-free scheme for distance protection compatible with inter-infeed and closed-loop feeders to protect lines in the microgrids. This scheme was based on negative sequence currents measured at the relay location and remained unaffected by negative sequence current suppressing converter-connected DGs and fault resistances.…”
Section: B Protective Strategy-based Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in Pandakov and Hoidalen (2017), a compensation scheme to omit errors due to impedances of faults and infeed currents was suggested. Biller and Jaeger (2018) proposed a voltage-free scheme for distance protection compatible with inter-infeed and closed-loop feeders to protect lines in the microgrids. This scheme was based on negative sequence currents measured at the relay location and remained unaffected by negative sequence current suppressing converter-connected DGs and fault resistances.…”
Section: B Protective Strategy-based Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, reference [28] proposed a compensation scheme to eliminate errors caused by faults impedances and infeed currents. In [29], a voltage-free distance protection scheme compatible with closed-loop structures and inter infeed was suggested. It was based on measuring negative-sequence currents at relay location and unaffected by negative-sequence current suppressing converter-connected DGs and fault resistances.…”
Section: Protective Strategy-based Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%