2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(02)00245-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltammetric determination of chloramphenicol in milk at electrochemically activated carbon fibre microelectrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak potential didn't shift at GCE. While plotting log current VS log scan rate, the slope value closes to the theoretical value of 0.5 refers to an ideal reaction to the diffusion process, when it closes to the theoretical value of 1.0, it refers to an ideal reaction to the adsorption process [34,35,36]. However, the intermediate value of the slope is observed, suggesting a mixed adsorption-diffusion controlled process [20].…”
Section: The Effect Of Voltammetric Parameterssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The peak potential didn't shift at GCE. While plotting log current VS log scan rate, the slope value closes to the theoretical value of 0.5 refers to an ideal reaction to the diffusion process, when it closes to the theoretical value of 1.0, it refers to an ideal reaction to the adsorption process [34,35,36]. However, the intermediate value of the slope is observed, suggesting a mixed adsorption-diffusion controlled process [20].…”
Section: The Effect Of Voltammetric Parameterssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The ideal diffusion‐controlled process has the slope value closes to the theoretical value of 0.5, but when the slope value approach to 1.0 the reaction become ideally adsorption controlled process . The slope value is 0.67 of DSV.2HCl at ZrO 2 ‐MSPE electrode, which is intermediate value attributed to mixing diffusion‐adsorption controlled reaction [31] which related to adsorption of thin layer electrolysis at electrode surface .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitherto, various kinds of methods have been utilized for the detection of CAP such as liquid chromatography, liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry, gas chromatography, chemiluminescence and capillary zone electrophoresis . Compare with the aforementioned methods, the electrochemical method is very simple, inexpensive, rapid and sensitive analytical method . However, the poor catalytic activity, less sensitivity and selectivity of the unmodified electrode affects the electrochemical performance of the sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%