1956
DOI: 10.1002/pol.1956.120209617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume–temperature relations of amorphous polymers over on extended temperature range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1957
1957
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, though poly-(styrene) and poly-(methyl methacrylate) have almost identical values of Tg their specific volumes in the liquid state are quite different. 23 In this instance, therefore, Tg does not vary with the liquid density, (30) F. Bueohe, J. Chem. Phy a., 24, 418 (1956).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, though poly-(styrene) and poly-(methyl methacrylate) have almost identical values of Tg their specific volumes in the liquid state are quite different. 23 In this instance, therefore, Tg does not vary with the liquid density, (30) F. Bueohe, J. Chem. Phy a., 24, 418 (1956).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Next, the slope of the excess free volume in the region above T g given as α L – α G would correspond to the coefficient of thermal expansion of the excess free volume α L f determined from the free volume, calculated with the probe radii between 0.5 and 0.6 Å (Figure b). The assumption that the excess free volume in glassy region would follow the slope of the thermal expansion, α G , for any probe other than that with zero radius is hard to justify and would ignore experimental curvatures, as already pointed out by Simha and Boyer. , Similarly, in the case of pure PVME the free volume fraction at T g computed by the predictive relation derived by the Simha–Boyer theory would be (α L – α G ) T g MD = (6.78 × 10 –4 K –1 – 3.00 × 10 –4 K –1 ) × 275 K = 10.4%. This is again close to the universal value 11.3%, and it corresponds to the value obtained by the probe with radius R p = 0.5 Å …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MANDELKERN, 1956). Toutefois, ces trois estimations conduisent h des valeurs de ]s/b et de Too tr~s voisines, mais l'inter-pr6tation physique du volume libre de relaxation est diff6rente dans chaque cas.…”
Section: Volumes Libres De Relaxationunclassified