2019
DOI: 10.1364/boe.10.000384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric quantitative optical coherence elastography with an iterative inversion method

Abstract: It is widely accepted that accurate mechanical properties of three-dimensional soft tissues and cellular samples are not available on the microscale. Current methods based on optical coherence elastography can measure displacements at the necessary resolution, and over the volumes required for this task. However, in converting this data to maps of elastic properties, they often impose assumptions regarding homogeneity in stress or elastic properties that are violated in most realistic scenarios. Here, we intro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at a more advanced stage, DCIS tends to result in dilation of ducts, and even small ducts can result in a fibrous stromal response in the surrounding tissue (52); thus, QME is expected to be sensitive to the associated mechanical changes caused by these features. The resolution of the technique may also improve in the future using the inverse method to solve for elasticity (55,56), rather than rely on assumptions of stress uniformity with depth, as in our current method; however, computation times currently prohibit this from being implemented in clinically feasible timeframes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at a more advanced stage, DCIS tends to result in dilation of ducts, and even small ducts can result in a fibrous stromal response in the surrounding tissue (52); thus, QME is expected to be sensitive to the associated mechanical changes caused by these features. The resolution of the technique may also improve in the future using the inverse method to solve for elasticity (55,56), rather than rely on assumptions of stress uniformity with depth, as in our current method; however, computation times currently prohibit this from being implemented in clinically feasible timeframes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this assumption is routinely violated in mechanically heterogeneous samples. One approach to overcome the limitations in image quality imposed by these assumptions is to use computational solutions to the inverse elasticity problem [55,56]. Despite a significant increase in computational overhead, such approaches have the potential to remove the influence of mechanical heterogeneity and boundary conditions on QME accuracy and resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point is that when acquiring individual OCT images, the stress applied by the silicone to the tissue is usually essentially inhomogeneous over the frame because the tissue boundary is normally curved and the tissue structure is mechanically very heterogeneous. This geometrical/structural inhomogeneity results in significantly different loading of the tissue, which may strongly (e.g., several times) affect the estimated tissue stiffness because of the pronounced nonlinearity of the “stress–strain” dependences for real tissues 14 , 15 , 39 43 , meaning that interpretation of the tissue stiffness may be very ambiguous without specifying (or standardizing) the loading conditions. Thus, the performed pressure standardization in the synthesized OCE scan (see OCE-section of “ Material and methods ” and Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%