“…While it may be the case that volunteer tourists feel for, and aspire to help, children living in poverty in particular parts of the world due to the prominence of such imagery in the media and volunteer tourism marketing, these figures also provide an ideological locus for cosmopolitan empathy to cohere around. The symbol of the vulnerable child permits volunteer tourists to engage with a nonthreatening, seemingly apolitical target of development in a way that not only generates the desired emotional experiences seen as critical for personal transformation to occur (Crossley, 2012a(Crossley, , 2012bZahra & McIntosh, 2007), but also implicitly maintains a paternalistic power dynamic between active, Northern care-givers and passive, Southern care-receivers (Barnett & Land, 2007;Mostafanezhad, 2013b;Silk, 2004;Sin, 2010). These are discourses and dynamics that serve the interests of the political and economic status quo, and so it is in this sense that cosmopolitan empathy can be conceived of as ideological.…”