Ethohydraulik 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17210-6_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vorbereitung ethohydraulischer Untersuchungen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this is a welcome feature since LFV processes of this type severely constrain models that generate neutrino masses radiatively [19]. This can be seen as the experimental constraint Br(µ → eγ) < 2.4 • 10 −12 [45] requires C 4 ∼ 1.5•10 −8 for M S = m 0 = 100 GeV. The flavor symmetry automatically reduces C 2 by a factor…”
Section: Radiative Lfv Decaysmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Note that this is a welcome feature since LFV processes of this type severely constrain models that generate neutrino masses radiatively [19]. This can be seen as the experimental constraint Br(µ → eγ) < 2.4 • 10 −12 [45] requires C 4 ∼ 1.5•10 −8 for M S = m 0 = 100 GeV. The flavor symmetry automatically reduces C 2 by a factor…”
Section: Radiative Lfv Decaysmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…LFV decays of charged leptons are allowed in several extensions of the SM, for instance supersymmetric models [217,218,219], left-right symmetric models [220] and models with heavy neutrinos [208,209,210,211]. Stringent upper limits on the decay µ − → e − γ have been set by the MEG experiment [221], while the most stringent upper limits on τ − → l − l + l − were set by the Belle experiment [222].…”
Section: Search For Lepton Flavour Violating and Very Rare Decaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+ → K − µ + µ + ) 5.4 × 10 −8 (95%) LHCb [213] B(B + → π − µ + µ + ) 1.3 × 10 −8 (95%) LHCb [212] B(B + → π − e + e + ) 2.3 × 10 −8 (90%) BaBar [214] B(B + → K − e + e + ) 3.0 × 10 −8 (90%) BaBar [214] B(B + → D − µ + µ + ) 6.9 × 10 −7 (95%) LHCb [212] B(B + → D * − µ + µ + ) 2.8 × 10 −6 (95%) LHCb [212] B(B + → D − e + e + ) 2.6 × 10 −6 (90%) Belle [215] B(B + → D − µ + e + ) 1.8 × 10 −6 (90%) Belle [215] B(B + → D − s µ + µ + ) 5.8 × 10 −7 (95%) LHCb [212] B(B + → D 0 π − µ + µ + ) 1.5 × 10 −6 (95%) LHCb [212] B(D 0 → µ + µ + ) 1.3 × 10 −8 (95%) LHCb [224] B(B s → µ + µ − µ + µ − ) 1.3 × 10 −8 (95%) LHCb [223] B(B 0 → µ + µ − µ + µ − ) 5.4 × 10 −9 (95%) LHCb [223] B(τ − → µ − µ + µ − ) 2.1 × 10 −8 (90%) Belle [222] B(τ − → e − e + e −) 2.7 × 10 −8 (90%) Belle [222] B(τ − → e − µ + µ − ) 2.7 × 10 −8 (90%) Belle [222] B(τ − → e + µ − µ − ) 1.7 × 10 −8 (90%) Belle [222] B(τ − → µ + e − e − ) 1.5 × 10 −8 (90%) Belle [222] B(τ − → µ − e + e − ) 1.8 × 10 −8 (90%) Belle [222] B(µ − → e − γ)2.4 × 10 −12 (90%) MEG[221] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the excellent muon reconstruction capabilities and the recently improved upperlimit on µ → eγ [8], we studied the SUSY seesaw induced µ-e cLFV and its discovery potential at a LC working with polarisable beams [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%