and Intensity Variability 3
Diagnostic balance equationBy setting ∂δ/∂t = 0 in (4), and neglecting terms involving the velocity potential χ,t h e relationship between ψ and h is obtained. This is the nonlinear balance equation in polar coordinates. Equation (9) indicates that given ψ or h with appropriate boundary conditions, the other field which is in quasi-balance with that field may be obtained. Since P =(∇ 2 ψ + f )/h, equations (8) and (9) are sufficient to describe the quasi-balanced evolution of a shallow water vortex. By substituting h =( ∇ 2 ψ + f )/P into the right hand side of (9), an invertibility relationship is obtained, where ψ, h, ζ, u and v may be obtained diagnostically, given P. This invertibility principle is the reason P is such a useful dynamical quantity. The shallow water dynamics can be succintly speficied by one prognostic PV equation and a diagnostic relationship for the other quasi-balanced fields. For the special case of axisymmetric flow in which v = ∂ψ/∂r and u = −∂ψ/r∂φ = 0, equation (9) reduces toimplying that, when enforcing the boundary conditions,which is the gradient wind balance equation. In this context, (9) is a more general formulation of the gradient wind balance equation when the flow is both asymmetric and balanced.
LinearizationEquations (3)-(5) cannot be solved analytically due to the nonlinear terms. However, under the assumption that perturbations are small in comparison to their means, a modified set of equations can be obtained that can be solved analytically. This process is referred to as linearization. In order to linearize (3)-(5), a basic state chosen here is that of an arbitrary axisymmetric vortexω(r)=v(r)/r that is in gradient balance with the heighth(r). While our basic state vortex is prescribed to be axisymmetric, the basic state could similarly be obtained by taking an azimuthal mean, i.e.,vand similar definitions hold for the other variables. ′ (r, φ, t), χ(r, φ, t)=χ ′ (r, φ, t),andψ(r, φ, t)=ψ ′ (r, φ, t). The perturbations u ′ , v ′ , ζ ′ ,andδ ′ are related to ψ ′ and χ ′ as above. Upon substituting the decomposed variables into (3)-(5), enforcing the gradient balance constraint, and neglecting higher order terms involving multiplication of perturbation quantities, we obtain the linearized versions of (3)-(5) which govern small amplitude disturbances about the basic state vortex,
The decomposition for all variables is as follows: h(r)=h(r)+h ′ (r, φ, t), v(r)=v(r)+v ′ (r, φ, t), u(r)=u ′ (r, φ, t), ζ(r)=ζ(r)+ ζ ′ (r, φ, t), δ(r)=δwhereη = f +ζ is the basic state absolute vertical vorticity. We wish to understand the nature and behavior of small disturbances (i.e., waves) on this basic state vortex. Using the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation, we assume normal mode solutions of the form ψ ′ (r, φ, t)=ψ exp[i(kr + mφ − νt)], χ ′ (r, φ, t)=χ exp[i(kr + mφ − νt)],a n d h ′ (r, φ, t)=ĥ exp[i(kr + mφ − νt)],w h e r ek is the radial wavenumber (i.e., the number of wave crests per unit radial distance), m is the azimuthal wave number (i.e.,...