2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19086-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vortex phase matching as a strategy for schooling in robots and in fish

Abstract: It has long been proposed that flying and swimming animals could exploit neighbour-induced flows. Despite this it is still not clear whether, and if so how, schooling fish coordinate their movement to benefit from the vortices shed by others. To address this we developed bio-mimetic fish-like robots which allow us to measure directly the energy consumption associated with swimming together in pairs (the most common natural configuration in schooling fish). We find that followers, in any relative position to a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
108
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
11
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This yields a downwards, high-velocity jet, which decreases the pressure on the follower's lower surface, thus explaining the lower P f required with respect to P s observed in figure 7c. This interaction is in agreement with the recently published work of Li et al (2020), who reported that a following fish in tandem saved energy when its tail motion matches the direction of the induced velocity of the wake's VRs.…”
Section: Flow Interaction Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This yields a downwards, high-velocity jet, which decreases the pressure on the follower's lower surface, thus explaining the lower P f required with respect to P s observed in figure 7c. This interaction is in agreement with the recently published work of Li et al (2020), who reported that a following fish in tandem saved energy when its tail motion matches the direction of the induced velocity of the wake's VRs.…”
Section: Flow Interaction Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To evaluate the hydrodynamic interactions of swimming in formation, we developed a method to place two robotic fish side-by-side at 0.33 BL. The formation and distance have been suggested as a configuration that could allow real fish, and experimental physical models of fish-like swimming, to save energy when in a group [12,14,16,41]. Because of the turbulence and backflow, it is difficult to dynamically control and keep a stable formation between the two robots.…”
Section: (A) Experimental Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish likely swim together to reap many benefits of congregation, which include reduced predation risk [4], increased foraging efficiency [5] and improved environmental sensing capabilities [6]. It has also been hypothesized that, from a biophysical standpoint, swimming in schools may benefit individuals energetically, since it could allow them to extract power from the vortices shed by their neighbours [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, by virtue of swimming in close proximity to a conspecific, the resulting fluid mechanic interactions between the adjacent fish are likely to result in a different flow structure from that in solitary swimming [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collective movements of animal groups are critical for species survival 1 . They provide protection from predation 2,3 , improve foraging 4,5 , and help with better energy utilization 6,7 . Presumably, the wide variety of group behaviors that characterize different species reflect underlying genetic changes, but to identify the precise role that individual genes play in controlling behavior, we need to first understand the underlying sensorimotor algorithms implemented by individual animals that give rise to emergent collective behavioral patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%