2011
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/53/12/124001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vorticity dynamics, drift wave turbulence, and zonal flows: a look back and a look ahead

Abstract: This paper surveys the basic ideas and results on fundamental models of drift wave turbulence, the formation of zonal flows, shear suppression of turbulence and transport, coupled drift wave and zonal flow dynamics and application to transport bifurcations and transitions. Application to vortex dynamics and zonal flow phenomena in EMHD systems are discussed, as well. These are relevant to aspects of ICF and laser plasma physics. Throughout, an effort is made to focus on fundamental physics ideas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drift waves, on the other hand, arise from E Â B convection of the electron density profile, and they become destabilized in the presence of a non-adiabatic electron response, due to, e.g., resistivity or finite electron mass. [19][20][21][22][23] As a matter of fact, in agreement with experimental results, low-frequency non-linear electromagnetic models (both fluid and gyrofluid) have identified the edge turbulent regimes, [3][4][5][6]24 showing that DW and BM instabilities determine the plasma turbulent dynamics. The relative importance of each mode, however, is still unclear, and non-linear simulations of edge and SOL turbulent dynamics have addressed both instabilities.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Drift waves, on the other hand, arise from E Â B convection of the electron density profile, and they become destabilized in the presence of a non-adiabatic electron response, due to, e.g., resistivity or finite electron mass. [19][20][21][22][23] As a matter of fact, in agreement with experimental results, low-frequency non-linear electromagnetic models (both fluid and gyrofluid) have identified the edge turbulent regimes, [3][4][5][6]24 showing that DW and BM instabilities determine the plasma turbulent dynamics. The relative importance of each mode, however, is still unclear, and non-linear simulations of edge and SOL turbulent dynamics have addressed both instabilities.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…These quantities are defined by Eqs. (16), (17), and (18) and verified by the conservation law (24).…”
Section: B Numerical Results In the Interchange Regimementioning
confidence: 69%
“…21 The turbulence quenching sheared flows in a plasma are identified as the E Â B-flows. [22][23][24] These flow shears are indeed observed as driven by Reynolds stress in the form of zonal flows, 3,25 and externally driven by probes generating a radial electric field, 26 and by various other mechanisms. This quenching mechanism is frequently modelled 13,14 as an effective diffusivity depending on the E Â Bflow shear,…”
Section: Transport Model For the L-h Transitionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although this very beneficial, L-to H-mode transition has been seen in most present day tokamaks, all physical mechanisms which are relevant to these transitions are still not fully identified. 2 Many different models have been introduced 3,4 to explain the reduction of transport due to the L-H transition. Some models, based on sets of 0-dimensional dynamical equations, are well capable of qualitatively describing global temporal evolution behaviour around L-H transitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%