1999
DOI: 10.1177/02783649922066277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voting as Validation in Robot Programming

Abstract: This paper investigates the use of voting as a conflict-resolution technique for data analysis in robot programming. Voting represents an information-abstraction technique. It is argued that in some cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Utete, Barshan and Ayrulu (1999), based on this algorithm, sensors assign probability masses to plane, corner and acute corner target types using Dempster±Shafer evidential reasoning. Combining the opinions of 15 sensing nodes using Dempster's rule of combination improves the correct decision percentage to 87%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Utete, Barshan and Ayrulu (1999), based on this algorithm, sensors assign probability masses to plane, corner and acute corner target types using Dempster±Shafer evidential reasoning. Combining the opinions of 15 sensing nodes using Dempster's rule of combination improves the correct decision percentage to 87%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example due to Utete et al [202], uses voting techniques for landmark classification from range data.…”
Section: Low-level Processing Of Laser Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ÿrst is Dempster-Shafer evidential reasoning which is well-suited for dealing with imprecise evidence and uncertainty in a more rational way than other tools [23][24][25]. The second technique is majority voting which provides fast and robust fusion in certain problems [26,27]. Despite the fast and robust fusion capability of majority voting, it involves certain consistency problems that limit its usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%