2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voting for women in nonpartisan and partisan elections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although research suggests that those who hold racist or sexist views might be reluctant to participate in an election that features all African-American candidates and two women in the runoff (Cassese and Barnes 2019; Cassese and Holman 2019; Piston 2010), we see no racial differences in who will not vote in the election or has not chosen a candidate yet. We do find that women took a longer time to decide in the runoff election, providing more evidence for a very complex gender affinity effect in low-information elections (Badas and Stauffer 2019;Cargile and Pringle 2019).…”
Section: Voters' Ideological Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although research suggests that those who hold racist or sexist views might be reluctant to participate in an election that features all African-American candidates and two women in the runoff (Cassese and Barnes 2019; Cassese and Holman 2019; Piston 2010), we see no racial differences in who will not vote in the election or has not chosen a candidate yet. We do find that women took a longer time to decide in the runoff election, providing more evidence for a very complex gender affinity effect in low-information elections (Badas and Stauffer 2019;Cargile and Pringle 2019).…”
Section: Voters' Ideological Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Absent the partisan cue, factors, such as name recognition (Kam and Zechmeister 2013) and demographic characteristics of candidates, provide informational shortcuts for voters (Alvarez, Hall, and Levin 2018;Badas and Stauffer 2019;Bauer 2020). Race and gender stereotypes provide cues for voters to assess a candidate's issue competencies, personal traits, and, ultimately, candidates' ideology (Bauer 2015a;Cassese and Holman 2018;Holman 2015;McDermott 1998;White, Laird, and Allen 2014).…”
Section: Low-information Electionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In state and national elections people usually use the general party position on issues to indicate who they should support (Petrocik 1996). However, in non-partisan elections, where the partisan cue is removed, candidate sex serves as a cue which can trigger perceptions about what issues a woman is better suited to handle in the mind of the voter (Badas & Stauffer 2019;McDermott 1997).…”
Section: Issues In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous scholarship has been inconclusive about the presence of gender affinity, we consider possible conditions that might result in a female candidate benefiting from women voters using sex as a deciding factor especially given that a woman had never been elected in this city as mayor previously. Particularly, because in their study regarding support for women in non-partisan judicial elections Badas and Stauffer (2019) found that women voters are more prone to support women when other informational cues aside from candidate sex are not present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%