Voting patterns and the gender wage gap

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in Voting Patterns and the Gender Wage Gap JANUARY 2018Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world's largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. Voting Patterns and the Gender Wage GapStriving for gender equality presents major challenges but the benefits are vast, ranging from reduced conflict, both within and between communities, to higher economic growth.Unfortunately Importantly, we find strong evidence of an association between a higher share of votes allocated to nationalist parties, in a given locality, and a larger, (adjusted), gender wage gap for both Jewish-Israelis and Arab-Israelis. JEL Classification:J21, J31, J61, J45, C14, C24 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARYOur main results examine the effect of voter preferences, at the locality level, on wages and the gender wage gap for Jewish and Arab Israelis. Jewish and Arab political parties were categorized based on the language used in party platforms: Category 1 parties prioritize gender equity in many spheres, Category 2 parties focus on a nationalistic agenda and references to women's rights are largely limited to human rights, whereas Category 3 parties do not mention women in their platforms. A high share of Category 1 voters in a given locality is associated with both a sizeable premium and a gender-wage gap that increases at higher points of the wage distribution. Furthermore, the premium is reduced and the gender gap is eliminated when characteristics such as education and industry are accounted for. Localities with a high percentage of Category 3 voters earn the lowest wages, but with the except...

Being a second generation Muslim woman in the French labour market

“…They were all university educated (educational qualifications ranging from BAs to 7 Obviously, this is not the only method one can use to understand how cultural and social norms affect economic outcomes. For example, Adnan and Miaari (2018) show that across both Arab and Jewish municipalities, the gender wage gap increases with the percentage of nationalist voters per municipality.…”

The Influence of gender disparities in the Employment Sector on Economic Growth in Indonesia

“…Gender disparities in Indonesia in the employment sector are caused by several factors such as wage gap, education level, and health. "An analysis of gender wage gaps across five developed countries using Glassdoor salary data, identified a gender wage gap of 24.1% in the United States, with two-thirds of that wage gap explained by differences in workers' characteristics and the most dominant factors being differences in industry and occupational choices (Chamberlain, 2016)" (Adnan and Miaari, 2018).…”