2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.757744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voting Transparency in a Monetary Union

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Issing (1999), among others, has expressed concern about the pressure that national authorities would exert on the members of the ECB council if individual voting behavior were published. This argument is also developed in a formal model by Gersbach and Hahn (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, Issing (1999), among others, has expressed concern about the pressure that national authorities would exert on the members of the ECB council if individual voting behavior were published. This argument is also developed in a formal model by Gersbach and Hahn (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…4 Gersbach and Hahn (2004) show that the publication of voting records may be beneficial if central bankers pursue different objectives. Their findings, however, are reversed in the case of a monetary union, where central bankers may pursue the interests of their national countries (see Gersbach and Hahn 2005). In this case, transparency may lead to increased national outsider pressure and induce central bankers to behave in the interests of their own governments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It makes it easier for national governments to appoint central bankers who have preferences that are in line with national interests, but this might not be desirable for the aggregate monetary union social welfare. Gersbach and Hahn (2005) show that voting transparency can lead to more weight on national, instead of supranational interests, which could make this kind of transparency undesirable when the central bankers' private bene-…ts are relatively high (such that they care more about re-appointments than about bene…cial policy outcomes). In Gersbach and Hahn (2006a) procedural transparency makes it easier to reelect central bankers that are highly e¢ cient (good in choosing the right interest rate), such that the competence level of the central bank governing council is increased.…”
Section: Committeesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While an increase in transparency can raise welfare by reducing the information asymmetry, strategic behavior could potentially offset the welfare gain if policymakers withhold information during their deliberations in order to enhance their reputations. Gersbach and Hahn (2004, 2005, 2008) model the effects of publishing monetary policy votes and show that the net effect of increased transparency depends on whether the public objective of the voter is sufficiently strong relative to his or her private objective. Meade and Stasavage (2008) model the effects of opening the FOMC's deliberations to public view and provide empirical evidence to support the hypothesis that the publication of transcripts made policymakers less willing to voice disagreement with the chairman's policy proposal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%