Vulnerability management by means of resilience

Abstract

The article decodes and analyzes the standard functions of social and socialecological systems when they manage their own vulnerability. The author acknowledges these as ''Resilience functions'' or ''Operational Resilience''. For this purpose, she follows a ''Vulnerability Actor'' (V Actor)-based approach. V Actor is considered as a system faced with multiple hazards, carrying various vulnerability facets (physical, economic, institutional, etc.) and attempting to transform, transfer, rearrange them in time and space so as to achieve Actor's own persistence. It is these processes of vulnerability re-arrangement that are identified by the author as Resilience functions and which change the vulnerability not only of the V Actor performing resilience but also others'. Performance of Resilience functions presupposes attraction and employment of resources by the Actor, not only own, current and inherent but also other resources to be found in spatial and temporal scales external to or beyond the Actor but which the Actor can appeal to. This attraction most probably leads to deprivation of others of the necessary resources for their persistence, recovery, etc. When somebody' vulnerability is reduced sometimes somewhere, it is most probable that others elsewhere are encumbered with extra vulnerability, currently or in the future. Hence, what resilience can only do is vulnerability re-arrangement, re-setting and management. The proposed systemic approach is documented on current state of art regarding interactions between vulnerability and resilience to hazards and on empirical evidence from the international experience of responses to natural hazards.Keywords Vulnerability to hazards Á Resilience Á Spatio-temporal change of vulnerability Á Vulnerability management Á Sustainability of socio-ecological systems Á Multi-hazard vulnerability assessment

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The dynamics among poverty, vulnerability, and resilience: evidence from coastal Bangladesh

“…From the other side, the households living close to the exposed zones could maintain a significantly higher level of asset profile after the cyclone. These findings resemble to Sapountzaki's (2012) axiom on the vulnerability-resilience dynamics, where resilience is structured as a process of vulnerability re-arrangement and a function of unevenly distributed opportunities among communities.…”

Resiliência: de uma noção "heróica" a um conceito sociológico

“…These studies have explored how local communities (Wilson, 2012), economic sectors and individual firms (Rose, 2007) have recovered from such disasters, emphasizing how elements such as social capital play an integral part in such processes (Aldrich, 2012) and how these processes are shaped by pre-shock vulnerabilities (Akter and Mallick, 2013) and involve significant environmental, social and economic costs as well as transfer of risks between social actors and between these and the environment (Sapountzaki, 2012).…”

“…Increased reliance on extended family networks to provide for services hitherto supported by paid or state-provided services -for instance, childcare -may lead to burdening extended family members and result in increased tensions and eventual breakdowns in family relations (Pleasence and Balmer, 2012). The same goes for natural resources: illegal tapping of groundwater by families to make up for the deterioration of public water supply in drought affected areas may result in further ecological degradation and aggravation of water shortages (Sapountzaki, 2012).…”

Integrating disciplinary contributions to achieve community resilience to natural disasters

“…Individual or organisational resilience and other types of crises were not directly considered, although some of the ideas may be applicable to those situations. There is a large literature on resilience, including many definitions (Bruneau et al 2003;Cutter et al 2008;Downes et al 2013;Folke 2006;Hufschmidt 2011;Norris et al 2008;Rose 2009;Sapountzaki 2011; White House, Office of the Press Secretary 2013). Drawing especially on Cutter et al (2008), here I define resilience as a system's ability to absorb, cope with, adapt to, and recover from the negative impacts of a hazard event.…”