“…Indeed, as Peter Kraska (2007: 508) notes, such military-grade material is now deployed as a matter of routine in a wide range of US policing contexts in ways that were unheard of and would have been deemed unacceptable some three decades ago, for example in searches of private homes: ‘It is critical to recognize that these are not forced reaction situations necessitating use of force specialists; instead they are the result of police departments choosing to use an extreme and highly dangerous tactic, not for terrorists or hostage-takers, but for small-time drug possessors and dealers.’ As Kraska (2007: 506) also notes, the rise in use of such militarized policing tactics, units and equipment has been astonishing: in the early 1980s the yearly average of SWAT-team deployments or callouts stood at 3,000, whereas by 2007 this had risen to 45,000. As Anna Feigenbaum and Daniel Weissmann argue in their compelling study of the world’s largest international security trade fair, Milipol – the very name of which advertises the convergence of policing and the military – such widely attended expos ‘can be seen as a space in which the values of police militarisation manifest’ (Feigenbaum and Weissmann, 2016: 485), in particular the conflation between political dissent and insurgency, and such events also demonstrate that, for a security industry developing new technologies, ‘the police and the military are increasingly regarded as two slices of the same pie’ (Feigenbaum and Weissmann, 2016: 482).…”