2013
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2012.2233733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

W-Band Chirp Radar Mock-Up Using a Glow Discharge Detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application based MMW, as described above are well needed. Previous works of using very inexpensive Glow Discharge Detectors (GDD) in W-band were performed and presented [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The GDD is a low-pressure miniature neon indicator lamp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Application based MMW, as described above are well needed. Previous works of using very inexpensive Glow Discharge Detectors (GDD) in W-band were performed and presented [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The GDD is a low-pressure miniature neon indicator lamp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of the GDD were described in detail in [12]. In the last few years small GDD arrays such as 8 × 8 FPA and an 18 × 2 scanner have been developed and tested, and found to yield very good MMW image quality despite the large size and dimensions of the lamps [12][13][14][15]. Recent results include the use of oversampling sub-pixel shifting to obtain high resolution images [12] on the order of 0.9 milliradians in special circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, applications involving sandstorms generate high interest from military groups in order to be ready for new desert combat. FMCW radar detection can enhance the information provided by the system since the image received also contains the distance to the target [4]. FMCW advantages and disadvantages are described briefly in [4], and the two methods, FMCW and direct detection, are compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high cost, complicated production processes, and alignment difficulties call for the development of low-cost MMW components for quasi-optical and imaging systems [2] . A good example of such a component is the glow discharge detector, which is a very inexpensive detector for MMW imaging systems that costs about $0.30 [3][4][5] . On the other hand, the imaging mirror is very expensive and very difficult to align due to its weight and large aperture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%