2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009503118377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, the present study shows that organizational processes vary in their relative rate of development, with some processes attaining ultimate levels of functioning earlier than others (see also, e.g., Enns et al, 2000; Kovács, 2000; Mondloch et al, 2003). Furthermore, the processes that exhibited different developmental trajectories are the ones identified by microgenetic analysis as differing in time course and attentional demands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In sum, the present study shows that organizational processes vary in their relative rate of development, with some processes attaining ultimate levels of functioning earlier than others (see also, e.g., Enns et al, 2000; Kovács, 2000; Mondloch et al, 2003). Furthermore, the processes that exhibited different developmental trajectories are the ones identified by microgenetic analysis as differing in time course and attentional demands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The present findings also help resolve the apparent contradiction in the developmental literature. On the one hand, Enns et al (2000) and Burack et al (2000) used few-element patterns and found age-related improvements in search rates for globally defined but not for locally defined targets. These results were compatible with Enns and Kingstone's (1995) findings with adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Predominantly, a local processing bias is noted early in development with a global precedence effect emerging from age 5 (e.g., Poirel et al, 2008; Vinter et al, 2010), perhaps a consequence of immature hemispheric communication at younger ages (Moses et al, 2002; and see Smith and Chatterjee, 2008, for a review). Moreover, some suggest that this global precedence can in fact only be seen much later in development, with local precedence appearing to dominate perceptual organization until adolescence, followed by a gradual transition to more a global processing style (Dukette and Stiles, 1996; Mottron et al, 1999, 2003; Enns et al, 2000; Porporino et al, 2004; Kimchi et al, 2005; Scherf et al, 2009). However, evidence for the reverse pattern has also been found, with demonstrations that 6 and 10 year-olds showed strong global bias, stronger even than that of adults (Mondloch et al, 2003), and that infants show greater sensitivity to global than to local structure in visual stimuli (Quinn and Eimas, 1986; Ghim and Eimas, 1988; Freeseman et al, 1993; Quinn et al, 1993; Frick et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, attention to global form appears to develop gradually until 8 years of age, and then, once adult-like or better-than-adult-like performance is reached, a rapid improvement in local processing is observed. This pattern of development is reminiscent of early claims concerning the ontogenesis of form perception (Werner, 1935; see also Enns, Burack, Iarocci, & Randolph, 2000). From this perspective, children were assumed to be global processors early in life, followed by increasing expertise at this gist or scene-level analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%