1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1003869230591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, only upper limits on the 5-GHz radio luminosity of a few neutron star LMXBs have been reported in the literature at X-ray luminosities 10 34 erg s -1 (e.g., Tudor et al 2017;Gallo et al 2018). By contrast, while in their disk states, two of the three tMSPs have been firmly detected at 5-GHz with X-ray luminosities between 10 32 -10 34 erg s -1 (Hill et al 2011;Deller et al 2015) (the third tMSP is at much higher L X , Papitto et al 2013). Despite the limited statistics, tMSPs appear to be more radio bright than typical neutron star LMXBs at the same X-ray luminosity, possibly due to the ejection of disk matter by a propeller mechanism (Deller et al 2015), though the existing radio upper limits for such systems at L X ∼ 10 32 -10 34 erg s -1 are not particularly constraining.…”
Section: Radio Continuum Observationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, only upper limits on the 5-GHz radio luminosity of a few neutron star LMXBs have been reported in the literature at X-ray luminosities 10 34 erg s -1 (e.g., Tudor et al 2017;Gallo et al 2018). By contrast, while in their disk states, two of the three tMSPs have been firmly detected at 5-GHz with X-ray luminosities between 10 32 -10 34 erg s -1 (Hill et al 2011;Deller et al 2015) (the third tMSP is at much higher L X , Papitto et al 2013). Despite the limited statistics, tMSPs appear to be more radio bright than typical neutron star LMXBs at the same X-ray luminosity, possibly due to the ejection of disk matter by a propeller mechanism (Deller et al 2015), though the existing radio upper limits for such systems at L X ∼ 10 32 -10 34 erg s -1 are not particularly constraining.…”
Section: Radio Continuum Observationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In all the known tMSPs that have been observed in their disk states, bright, flat-spectrum radio emission is present. This has been explained by partially self-absorbed synchrotron radiation coming from a compact jet-like outflow (e.g., Hill et al 2011;Deller et al 2015;Papitto & Torres 2015), though the short timescale anti-correlation between X-ray and radio emission in the tMSP J1023+0038 in its disk state clouds a simple jet interpretation for the radio emission (Bogdanov et al 2018).…”
Section: Radio Continuum Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magenta stars are accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars (AMXPs: Migliari et al 2005Migliari et al , 2011Tudor et al 2016Tudor et al , 2017Tetarenko et al 2017;van den Eijnden et al 2018a;Strohmayer et al 2018a). The green triangles are transitional millisecond pulsars (tMSPs) when they have switched from rotation powered to accretion powered mode (Hill et al 2011;Papitto et al 2013;Deller et al 2015;Bogdanov et al 2018). The purple upside-down triangles are Z sources (Migliari & Fender 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, tM-SPs are among the most radio-bright NS systems and, if they obey their current observed L r -L x trend (Deller et al 2015), are expected to be at least an order of magnitude brighter in the radio than our upper limit for 4U 1543−624. Furthermore, they exhibit many other unique phenomena, e.g., optical pulsations, radio pulsations, rapid X-ray and radio flaring, gamma ray emission -none of which have been observed in 4U 1543−624 (Hill et al 2011;Papitto et al 2013;Bogdanov & Halpern 2015;Bogdanov et al 2015;Zampieri et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first batch of S. rufinosus was therefore released in 1997 (Hill, 1998b). Having then been introduced in 46 sites they established in at least 31 and completely controlled A. filiculoides in 20 (Hill and Cilliers, 1999;Hill 1999). Since the predator certainly ignores countries borders, reconciling the opposing views of promoters of Azolla development for agronomic purposes and promoters of its destruction is really difficult.…”
Section: Azolla As a Weedmentioning
confidence: 99%