2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1017595421248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) version of this model, also introduced in PS07, permits to study turbulent dynamo action for arbitrary low or high values of P m. In PS07 we calculated the energy transfer functions of the MHD system in a (statistically stationary) saturated state. We found that for P m ≤ 1 the energy transfers are mainly local, eventually strengthening our previous results obtained with a local shell model of MHD turbulence (Stepanov & Plunian 2006). For P m ≫ 1 the dominant transfers are also mainly local except the ones from the flow scales lying in the inertial range to the magnetic scales smaller than the viscous scale.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) version of this model, also introduced in PS07, permits to study turbulent dynamo action for arbitrary low or high values of P m. In PS07 we calculated the energy transfer functions of the MHD system in a (statistically stationary) saturated state. We found that for P m ≤ 1 the energy transfers are mainly local, eventually strengthening our previous results obtained with a local shell model of MHD turbulence (Stepanov & Plunian 2006). For P m ≫ 1 the dominant transfers are also mainly local except the ones from the flow scales lying in the inertial range to the magnetic scales smaller than the viscous scale.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is also consistent with the fact that the dynamo threshold should not depend on P m in the limit of low P m as shown previously (Ponty etal. 2005;Stepanov & Plunian 2006;Schekochihin etal. 2007).…”
Section: Kinematic Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us remark that the statistical properties of intermittent fluctuations, computed either using shell variables or the in-stantaneous rate of energy dissipation, are in close qualitative and quantitative agreement with those measured in laboratory experiments, for homogeneous and isotropic turbulence [14]. MHD shell model -introduced in [15]allow a description of turbulence at low magnetic Prandtl number since the steps of both cascades can be freely adjusted [16,17]. Although geometrical features are lost, this is a clear advantage over 3D simulations [18,19].…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…Here we choose the one referred to as Sabra shell model. MHD shell model -introduced in [15] -allow a description of turbulence at low magnetic Prandtl number since the steps of both cascades can be freely adjusted [16,17]. We consider a formulation extended from the Sabra hydrodynamic shell model:…”
Section: Simple Model Of Magnetic Reversalsmentioning
confidence: 99%