2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1017585407870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of days to growth initiation was much smaller for cloned material in this experiment (10-28 days) as compared to previously reported seed germination ranges of 10-47.4 days [22]. Our data supports previous research showing that somatic regeneration of pepper is feasible [24,25]. Plant growth proceeded normally in all cloned material.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The range of days to growth initiation was much smaller for cloned material in this experiment (10-28 days) as compared to previously reported seed germination ranges of 10-47.4 days [22]. Our data supports previous research showing that somatic regeneration of pepper is feasible [24,25]. Plant growth proceeded normally in all cloned material.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The possibility of vegetative in vitro mass propagation of pepper can overcome the difficulties listed above, providing an unlimited number of entirely homogeneous, healthy in vitro plantlets, independently of season (Song et al, 2010;Otroshy et al, 2011). According to Dabauza and Peña (2001), pepper micropropagation is a unique tool that is very convenient for maintaining the genetic homogeneity of the elite plant materials, as well as for preserving heterozygous genotypes and genetically transformed forms. Additionally, the discussed method facilitates the gathering and management of pepper germplasm collections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerous experiments that followed demonstrated that the effectiveness of plant micropropagation in different species of pepper (Capsicum spp.) varies depending on the plant genotype, the type of initial explant, and the factors and conditions of in vitro cultures (Phillips and Hubstenberger, 1985;Rajam, 1994, 1996;Dabauza and Peña, 2001). In consequence, effective methods have been developed for specific cultivars that recommend necessary modifications for particular genotypes (Dabauza and Peña, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major bottlenecks in Capsicum regeneration are the general low frequency of shoot formation and the development of malformed shoot buds and shoots (variously referred to in the literature as rosette shoots, leafy shoots or blind leaves) that fail to elongate, most likely due to the absence of a shoot apical meristem (Dabauza and Pena 2003; Engler et al 1993; Kothari et al 2010; Liu et al 1990; Mihálka et al 2003; Wolf et al 2001). In general, the chili (hot) pepper types are much more responsive for in vitro regeneration than the sweet pepper types (Dabauza and Pena 2001; Engler et al 1993; Khan et al 2006; Lopez-Puc et al 2006; Ochoa-Alejo and Ramirez-Malagon 2001; Solís-Ramos et al 2010; Zapata-Castillo et al 2007) although a strong genotype dependency has been observed in both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%