1917
DOI: 10.1007/bf02189254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wachstumsmessungen an Sphodromantis bioculata Burm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1927
1927
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative slope of the linear regression decreases with declining feeding level (see Table 2 for sample sizes). results show that growth in bridge spiders follows a regular geometric progression that we described as an exponential growth function (post-moult weight over instar), which would be consistent with Dyar's (1890) and Przibram and Megušar's (1912) widely accepted assumption that growth ratios of successive instars are constant. However, a more detailed analysis of growth ratios for successive instars revealed decreasing growth ratios with later moults.…”
Section: Growth Models For Bridge Spider Developmentsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The negative slope of the linear regression decreases with declining feeding level (see Table 2 for sample sizes). results show that growth in bridge spiders follows a regular geometric progression that we described as an exponential growth function (post-moult weight over instar), which would be consistent with Dyar's (1890) and Przibram and Megušar's (1912) widely accepted assumption that growth ratios of successive instars are constant. However, a more detailed analysis of growth ratios for successive instars revealed decreasing growth ratios with later moults.…”
Section: Growth Models For Bridge Spider Developmentsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Here, we introduce the growth parameters developmental growth rate, growth coefficient, and intermoult ageing rate to compare entire growth trajectories for arthropods with varying instar numbers. The developmental growth rate F G describes body weight increases between moults; the postulated growth rate of 2.0 (Przibram & Megušar, 1912) was only found under low feeding conditions. Depending on feeding conditions, F G can be larger (high food) or lower (very low food) than 2.0.…”
Section: Growth Models For Bridge Spider Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They report that the average of the mean length ratios in successive instars for the 74 structures measured is 1.286 for Ectobius Zapponicus and 1.250 for E. panzeri, again close to Przibram's Rule. Przibram's Rule is an extension of Dyar's Rule (Dyar, 1890) in that the latter refers to increments in linear dimensions of holometabolous insects, while the former relates increments in linear dimensions in successive instars of hemimetabolous insects to increments in weight (Przibram & MeguSar, 1912;Cole, 1980). If Przibram's Rule applies to male 2. rufipes, then the observation of Peckham & Peckham (1 889) may mean that the 'two forms of male' found in this species result from males maturing at two different instars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dyar (as mentioned by Usinger, 1942) suggested that the sclerotized parts of the insect body increase in size in a more or less regular geometrical progression during successive instars, there being a growth factor for each species representing the increase in size at each moult. Przibram (Przibram and Megusar, 1912) has extended this principle and gives a theoretical progression factor of 1-26 (the cube root of 2) for insects in general.…”
Section: (B) Progrission In Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%