“…Researchers have undertaken more than 30 studies of compensating differentials for risk in the U.S. labor market. Some studies have evaluated the wage-risk tradeoff for the entire labor force, while others have focused on subsamples such as specific occupations (e.g., police officers in Low and McPheters 1983), specific states (e.g., South Carolina in Butler 1983), blue-collar workers only (e.g., Dorman andHagstrom 1998 andFairris 1989), males only (e.g., Berger and Gabriel 1991), and union members only (e.g., Dillingham and Smith 1984). These hedonic labor market studies also vary in terms of their choice of mortality risk variable, which can significantly influence the estimation of a value of a statistical life (for comparison of NIOSH and BLS data, refer to Viscusi 1988a andDorman andHagstrom 1998).…”
Section: The Value Of a Statistical Life Based On Us Labor Market Smentioning
A substantial literature over the past thirty years has evaluated tradeoffs between money and fatality risks. These values in turn serve as estimates of the value of a statistical life. This article reviews more than 60 studies of mortality risk premiums from ten countries and approximately 40 studies that present estimates of injury risk premiums. This critical review examines a variety of econometric issues, the role of unionization in risk premiums, and the effects of age on the value of a statistical life. Our meta-analysis indicates an income elasticity of the value of a statistical life from about 0.5 to 0.6. The paper also presents a detailed discussion of policy applications of these value of a statistical life estimates and related issues, including risk-risk analysis.
“…Researchers have undertaken more than 30 studies of compensating differentials for risk in the U.S. labor market. Some studies have evaluated the wage-risk tradeoff for the entire labor force, while others have focused on subsamples such as specific occupations (e.g., police officers in Low and McPheters 1983), specific states (e.g., South Carolina in Butler 1983), blue-collar workers only (e.g., Dorman andHagstrom 1998 andFairris 1989), males only (e.g., Berger and Gabriel 1991), and union members only (e.g., Dillingham and Smith 1984). These hedonic labor market studies also vary in terms of their choice of mortality risk variable, which can significantly influence the estimation of a value of a statistical life (for comparison of NIOSH and BLS data, refer to Viscusi 1988a andDorman andHagstrom 1998).…”
Section: The Value Of a Statistical Life Based On Us Labor Market Smentioning
A substantial literature over the past thirty years has evaluated tradeoffs between money and fatality risks. These values in turn serve as estimates of the value of a statistical life. This article reviews more than 60 studies of mortality risk premiums from ten countries and approximately 40 studies that present estimates of injury risk premiums. This critical review examines a variety of econometric issues, the role of unionization in risk premiums, and the effects of age on the value of a statistical life. Our meta-analysis indicates an income elasticity of the value of a statistical life from about 0.5 to 0.6. The paper also presents a detailed discussion of policy applications of these value of a statistical life estimates and related issues, including risk-risk analysis.
“…Occupational injury rates may be influenced both by the inherent risk of the occupation and the characteristics of the people who enter the occupation (Low and McPheters [16]). In Thaler and Rosen's [32] study of compensating wage differentials, bartending has a higher risk of premature death than police or fire fighting despite the profession appearing safer based on objective criteria.…”
In a recent issue of this journal, Stuart Low and Lee McPheters [1983], hereafter L&M, using new data on police salaries and fatalities in the line of duty in 72 cities claim to find:(1) Police receive higher wages in cities with a greater chance of death, other things equal.(2) The value of life implied by their regression is computed to be an amount which exceeds estimates derived using a lost earnings procedure. The purpose of this comment is to indicate that L&M were mistaken in using simply the number of fatalities as the right-hand-side variable in testing for compensating wages and computing value of life.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent issue of this journal, Stuart Low and Lee McPheters [1983], hereafter L&M, using new data on police salaries and fatalities in the line of duty in 72 cities claim to find:…”
In a recent issue of this journal, Stuart Low and Lee McPheters [1983], hereafter L&M, using new data on police salaries and fatalities in the line of duty in 72 cities claim to find:(1) Police receive higher wages in cities with a greater chance of death, other things equal.(2) The value of life implied by their regression is computed to be an amount which exceeds estimates derived using a lost earnings procedure. The purpose of this comment is to indicate that L&M were mistaken in using simply the number of fatalities as the right-hand-side variable in testing for compensating wages and computing value of life. The appropriate right hand side variable is the probability of death.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.