2013
DOI: 10.1080/03585522.2013.797922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wage inequality in a developing open economy: Portugal, 1944–1984

Abstract: This paper estimates and analyses wage inequality trends in Portugal, from 1944 to 1984, a period that comprises the Estado Novo dictatorship and the first decade after the transition to democracy. Wage inequality is measured by the gap between skilled and unskilled labour, and reveals a downward trend in most of the period in analysis. We provide an explanation for the observed trends by looking at the influence of domestic and international forces on changes in the relative supply and demand of skilled labou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This helped to pressure wages down and keep the cost of labor for firms low. However, the rise of wages in this period shows that the industrial relations framework of the regime was not entirely effective in reaching the goal of keeping wages low, as they were pushed up by the scarcity of labor deriving from economic growth, mass emigration, and mobilization to the Colonial War (Lains et al, 2013, andAmaral, 2019). As a matter of fact, real earnings of workers increased at a pace of 6.7% per year between 1960 and 1973, roughly at a par with the growth rate of the economy (Lopes, 1996, p. 202).…”
Section: The Institutional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This helped to pressure wages down and keep the cost of labor for firms low. However, the rise of wages in this period shows that the industrial relations framework of the regime was not entirely effective in reaching the goal of keeping wages low, as they were pushed up by the scarcity of labor deriving from economic growth, mass emigration, and mobilization to the Colonial War (Lains et al, 2013, andAmaral, 2019). As a matter of fact, real earnings of workers increased at a pace of 6.7% per year between 1960 and 1973, roughly at a par with the growth rate of the economy (Lopes, 1996, p. 202).…”
Section: The Institutional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%