2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10797-017-9458-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wagner’s law, fiscal discipline, and intergovernmental transfer: empirical evidence at the US and German state levels

Abstract: Does fiscal discipline restrain government from increasing its budget size? To answer this question, this paper investigates whether Wagner's law is satisfied for two types of states: U.S. states, in which fiscal sovereignty is established, and German states, in which fiscal transfer dependence is high and budget constraints are softened. In U.S. states, we demonstrate that Wagner's law is validated, while some of the balanced budget requirements weaken the validity of the law. In German states, we find an "in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed evidence in support of Wagner's law. Yoshito Funashima and Kazuki Hiraga (2016) examined the Wagner's law for U.S. and German States. For the U.S. states, the data cover the period from 1977 to 2010.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed evidence in support of Wagner's law. Yoshito Funashima and Kazuki Hiraga (2016) examined the Wagner's law for U.S. and German States. For the U.S. states, the data cover the period from 1977 to 2010.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wagner's law implies that expenditure grows more than proportionally with income due to economic development (Prado et al, 2020) and provides theoretical principles and enables specific policy suggestions to achieve optimality in expanding public spending and its financing (Forte and Magazzino, 2018). The validity of Wagner's law has been identified by many studies (Tobin, 2005;Tasseven, 2011;Silva and Siqueira, 2014;Akitoby et al, 2006;Karagianni and Pempetzoglou, 2011;Barra et al, 2015;Magazzino et al, 2015;Bayrakdar et al, 2011;Barra et al, 2015;Funashima and Hiraga, 2017). Kumar and Cao (2020) supported Wagner's law in East Asian countries such as China, Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The validity of Wagner’s Law has been found by many researchers, for different countries and regions. For instance, Tobin (2005), for China; Tasseven (2011), for Turkey; Silva and Siqueira (2014), for Brazil; Akitoby, Clements, Gupta, & Inchauste (2006), for 51 developing countries; Karagianni and Pempetzoglou (2011) and Magazzino, Giolli, and Mele (2015), for European Union countries; Bayrakdar, Demez, and Yapar (2015), for 27 OECD countries; Narayan, Nielsen, and Smyth (2008), for 24 Chinese provinces; Jaén‐García (2011), for 17 autonomous communities of Spain; Narayan, Rath, and Narayan (2012), for 15 Indian states; Funashima and Hiraga (2017), for American and German states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%