1995
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.6998.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management

Abstract: The survival of patients in group B, who presented late, was found to be significantly better than the survival of patients in group A, who presented early. This finding is consistent with the. view that the onset of AIDS is delayed in patients who receive early medical intervention in HIV infection.""'2 However, the finding suggests that the subsequent survival of these patients when they develop AIDS may be commensurately decreased. We believe that our data are compatible with the results of the Concorde and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

31
1,043
7
135

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,507 publications
(1,216 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
31
1,043
7
135
Order By: Relevance
“…As a measure of both overall obesity and central obesity, we determined the optimal cut-off points for WC. These cut-off points were in agreement with internationally used cut-off points as determined by Lean et al (1995): 102 cm for men and 88 cm for women.…”
Section: Anthropometrysupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a measure of both overall obesity and central obesity, we determined the optimal cut-off points for WC. These cut-off points were in agreement with internationally used cut-off points as determined by Lean et al (1995): 102 cm for men and 88 cm for women.…”
Section: Anthropometrysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For international comparison, we used the cut-off values proposed by Lean et al (1995), that is, a WHR equal to or greater than 0.95 for men and 0.80 for women.…”
Section: Anthropometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain regions of the torso change in proportion to the change in body mass, where others show little change 39. Waist circumference is a good predictor of the body's adiposity 40, 41. For example, Tovée et al9 report that the waist width of 134 adult women is correlated at r  > 0.90 with their BMI, whereas higher and lower regions of their torso show weaker correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more sensitive measure is waist circumference, which gives information about the central fat distribution and is used to define abdominal obesity. 7 Although environmental factors have an important function, there is significant evidence for a heritable component in obesity. 8,9 In general, the total variance in BMI explained by genetic factors varies between 20 and 90%, with a most probable value around 40%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%