2016
DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a4007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waist Circumference-to-Height Ratio Detected in a Convenient Sample of Young Slovak People with Increased Cardio-Metabolic Risk

Abstract: SUMMARYBackground and Aim: Cardiovascular disease is a serious problem increasingly affecting young people worldwide. Cardio-metabolic risk factors include lipid profile parameters and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), as well as basic anthropometric parameters such as the ratio of waist circumference to height (WHtR). The aim of our study was to determine WHtR.Method: WHtR was determined in a group of 500 clinically healthy young people aged 18-25 and, on the basis of measured data, a reference range for WHt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In both studies, LDLcholesterol analysis confirmed almost equal values while comparing males and females. In literature, LDLCH arithmetic mean was 2.80 mmol/l for males vs 2.77 mmol/l for females (21) and our survey confirmed level of LDLCH 2.67 mmol/l for males versus 2.85 mmol/l for females. When comparing the values of TCH and LDLCH with the established standards, we can evaluate these standards as very strong -28.0 % of student confirmed higher TCH levels than 4.5 mmol/l and 16.57% of student surpassed the LDLCH limit of more than 2.5 mmol/l.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In both studies, LDLcholesterol analysis confirmed almost equal values while comparing males and females. In literature, LDLCH arithmetic mean was 2.80 mmol/l for males vs 2.77 mmol/l for females (21) and our survey confirmed level of LDLCH 2.67 mmol/l for males versus 2.85 mmol/l for females. When comparing the values of TCH and LDLCH with the established standards, we can evaluate these standards as very strong -28.0 % of student confirmed higher TCH levels than 4.5 mmol/l and 16.57% of student surpassed the LDLCH limit of more than 2.5 mmol/l.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Their paper confirmed the average TCH level for men -4.4 mmol/l; in our study it was 4.31 mmol/l. For the group of females, the cholesterol levels in literature study (21) were 4.64 mmol/l, while our research indicates an average of 4.52 mmol/l. The same authors (21) have confirmed significantly higher TCH levels for females compared to males, which is in agreement with our out puts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From different countries and races, mean boundary values for WHtR would be 0.50 for men and women [12], 0.50 in men and 0.52 in women [22], 0.54 in both [23], 0.58 for discriminating individuals with metabolic syndrome [24]. Standard range of WHtR would be from 0.41 to 0.52 for men and from 0.38 to 0.50 for women [25]. Use of a simple boundary value for WHtR (0.5) identifies more people at 'early health risk' than BMI and WC [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, several factors such as population, sample size, ethnicity, age, gender, smoking and physical activity status would be necessary for precise research. Secondly, basal biomarkers such as lipids, atherogenic index (AI) [25], creatinine, uric acid and other data would be desirable to be included. Thirdly, diabetic micro-and macro-angiopathy including cerebral vascular accident (CVA) [33], cardiovascular disease (CVD) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) as well as hypertension [30] and hyperlipidemia would be investigated together with the anthropometric measurement [34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%