2009
DOI: 10.4077/cjp.2009.amh064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waist to Height Ratio as a Predictor of Abdominal Fat Distribution in Men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We defined abdominal obesity based on WC measurements. While some studies have introduced WC as a better anthropometric measure than waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios for central fat accumulation [59,60], others have failed to confirm this [61]. This is of particular importance in Middle Eastern countries, where an exact definition of abdominal obesity still needs further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined abdominal obesity based on WC measurements. While some studies have introduced WC as a better anthropometric measure than waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios for central fat accumulation [59,60], others have failed to confirm this [61]. This is of particular importance in Middle Eastern countries, where an exact definition of abdominal obesity still needs further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that WHtR was strongly associated with visceral adipose tissue [23], while adiponectin was inversely associated with visceral adipose tissue [21,22]. Furthermore, WHtR has been reported to be a stronger predictor of visceral adipose tissue than BMI or WC among adults [24,25]. Therefore, WHtR could be the most useful anthropometric variable for predicting adiponectin levels, which suggests that the monitoring of WHtR is an effective tool for the prevention of MetS, especially among obese students, because the correlation coefficients were consistently higher in the obesity groups than in the non-obesity groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite not being accepted consensually (3,4) , WHtR was further suggested to be preferable to other indices and clinical assessments, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), for predicting cardiovascular risk factors in different ethnic and age groups (5,6) . WHtR also appeears to be at least similarly associated with abdominal fat as is WC, and better than both BMI and WHR (7,8) . To our knowledge, few studies have focused on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients using WHtR (9,10) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%