Walking enhances peripheral visual processing in humans

Abstract

Cognitive processes are almost exclusively investigated under highly controlled settings during which voluntary body movements are suppressed. However, recent animal work suggests differences in sensory processing between movement states by showing drastically changed neural responses in early visual areas between locomotion and stillness. Does locomotion also modulate visual cortical activity in humans, and what are the perceptual consequences? Our study shows that walking increased the contrast-dependent influence of peripheral visual input on central visual input. This increase is prevalent in stimulus-locked electroencephalogram (EEG) responses (steady-state visual evoked potential [SSVEP]) alongside perceptual performance. Ongoing alpha oscillations (approximately 10 Hz) further positively correlated with the walking-induced changes of SSVEP amplitude, indicating the involvement of an altered inhibitory process during walking. The results predicted that walking leads to an increased processing of peripheral visual input. A second study indeed showed an increased contrast sensitivity for peripheral compared to central stimuli when subjects were walking. Our work shows complementary neurophysiological and behavioural evidence corroborating animal findings that walking leads to a change in early visual neuronal activity in humans. That neuronal modulation due to walking is indeed linked to specific perceptual changes extends the existing animal work.

Corollary Discharge versus Efference Copy: Distinct Neural Signals in Speech Preparation Differentially Modulate Auditory Responses

“…These results suggest that efference copy carries specific content information, and selectively modulate the auditory system that represents the perceptual consequence of speaking. Our results are consistent with recent observations of action induced enhancement (Cao & Händel, 2019;Eliades & Wang, 2005Enikolopov et al, 2018;Flinker et al, 2010;Ma & Tian, 2019;Singla et al, 2017;Tian & Poeppel, 2013;Tian et al, 2016).…”

Interstitial ions: A key regulator of state-dependent neural activity?

“…However, the internal brain state is constantly fluctuating along a continuum, even in the absence of overt behavioral changes ( Harris and Thiele, 2011 ; Lee and Dan, 2012 ; McGinley et al, 2015b ; Poulet and Crochet, 2019 ): From a synchronized state characterized by strong, low-frequency delta oscillations to a desynchronized state where these are suppressed and high-frequency gamma oscillations become more pronounced. In turn, the brain state profoundly influences the operating mode of the brain by virtue of changes in, for example, spontaneous neuronal activity, the ability to execute motor commands, and responses to external sensory stimuli ( Cao and Händel, 2019 ; Destexhe et al, 1999 ; Livingstone and Hubel, 1981 ; Massimini et al, 2005 ; Polack et al, 2013 ).…”

Alteration of brain dynamics during natural dual-task walking

“…Stationary dual-task studies have demonstrated that a tonic increase in theta power (4-7 Hz) together with a decrease in alpha power (8)(9)(10)(11)(12) are often observed over wide areas of the scalp under higher task demand (Klimesh et al, 1999). Focusing on MoBI studies, despite the diversity of task designs and modalities, higher PSD in the theta band has been observed when walking compared to standing or resting still (Presacco et al, 2011;Peterson & Ferris, 2018).…”