1986
DOI: 10.1080/00102208608923893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall Flames and Implications for Upward Flame Spread

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
0
5

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
78
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger experiments by others [52,53] agree with the 2 3 � turbulent correlation while smaller scale studies, such as those presented here, often scale with unity [29]. A correlation performed by Tsai and Drysdale was recently submitted from a similar experiment, in which flame heights from a vertical sample of PMMA were investigated [29].…”
Section: Comparison To a Relevant Flame Height Correlationmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Larger experiments by others [52,53] agree with the 2 3 � turbulent correlation while smaller scale studies, such as those presented here, often scale with unity [29]. A correlation performed by Tsai and Drysdale was recently submitted from a similar experiment, in which flame heights from a vertical sample of PMMA were investigated [29].…”
Section: Comparison To a Relevant Flame Height Correlationmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The flame height for upward flame spread may be predicted from Eq. 1 [8][9][10][11][12], which suggests that the H is a function of  m /W and can be represented by the following power law function,…”
Section: Average Maximum Flame Height (H)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since eqs (11) and (12) It should be mentioned that the wood shown here and all other samples were tested under laboratory temperature and humidity that remained fairly constant at 20 'C and 50% RH so that changes in results due to wide variations in moisture content have been minimized. Table I of Douglas fir particle board in a vertical These results might be explained in terms of kpc increasing with temperature and by overestimating the Ti, with then influences h in eq (15). These variations in kpc and Tig should be considered acceptable for assessing ignition and subsequently flame spread when the empirical procedure is compared to the difficulty of measuring Tig directly especially for complex materials.…”
Section: I=f~q)= Bvt Tct*)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) Thus, kpc can be derived. The ignition data analysis yields the two effective properties, kpc and Tis, for a material.…”
Section: I=f~q)= Bvt Tct*)mentioning
confidence: 99%