2008
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.20237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall laws for fluid flows at a boundary with random roughness

Abstract: The general concern of this paper is the effect of rough boundaries on fluids. We consider a stationary flow, governed by incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, in an infinite domain bounded by two horizontal rough plates. The roughness is modeled by a spatially homogeneous random field, with characteristic size ". A mathematical analysis of the flow for small " is performed. The Navier's wall law is rigorously deduced from this analysis. This substantially extends former results obtained in the case of perio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
109
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
109
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that all these works formulate the roughness using a periodic function (whose amplitude and period are supposed to be small). In a context of more general "roughness" patterns, there exists similar recent results, see [3,15].…”
Section: General Frameworksupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that all these works formulate the roughness using a periodic function (whose amplitude and period are supposed to be small). In a context of more general "roughness" patterns, there exists similar recent results, see [3,15].…”
Section: General Frameworksupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Nevertheless, the ansatz will be different, depending on α. Second, recent works on random roughness, see [3,15], could make us think that our results can be extended to more general cases of roughness. In fact, the construction of our development strongly depends on the behavior of solutions of the Stokes equation on a half-space, whose lower boundary is periodic.…”
Section: General Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In a recent article Basson and Gérard-Varet [4] derive approximate boundary condition for a boundary with random roughness. The analysis of these previous papers is essentially based on the construction of the so-called "wall law", which is a boundary condition imposed on an artificial boundary inside the domain.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the modelling choices to account for friction phenomena are most often correlated with the refinement of the flow models used (NS, RANS, SV, ASV), but are also constrained by bed topographies and flow typologies in numerous cases. Several studies at the NS level of refinement advocate the use of the "partial slip" (Navier, 1827) condition or related formulations in which the near-bed slip velocity is either proportional to the shear stress (Jäger and Mikelic, 2001;Basson and Gerard-Varet, 2008) or depends on it in a non-linear way (Achdou et al, 1998;Jäger and Mikelic, 2003). Other works plead for "no-slip" conditions (Panton, 1984;CasadoDiaz et al, 2003;Myers, 2003;Bucur et al, 2008Bucur et al, , 2010 or suggest the separation of flow domains within or outside bed asperities, with a complete slip condition (non-zero tangential velocity) at the interface (Gerard-Varet and Masmoudi, 2010).…”
Section: Flow Typology 321 From Friction Laws and Bed Topography Tomentioning
confidence: 99%