2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2011.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall model and mesh influence study for partial cavities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For unsteady flows, the existence of a wall law is assumed to be valid at each instant. These assumptions have been studied in [34] and comparisons were proposed with a thin boundary layer approach.…”
Section: Wall Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For unsteady flows, the existence of a wall law is assumed to be valid at each instant. These assumptions have been studied in [34] and comparisons were proposed with a thin boundary layer approach.…”
Section: Wall Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For unsteady flows, the existence of a wall law is assumed to be valid at each instant. These assumptions have been studied in [29] and comparisons were proposed with a thin boundary layer approach.…”
Section: Wall Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In consequence the grid convergence in such cavitating flows raised lots of problems. In a previous work [29], we have investigated the mesh influence for the Venturi geometry in the near-wall area when a cavitation pocket develops and interacts with the turbulent boundary layer. We have considered five different meshes, with a final choice consisting of a H-type grid, which contains 251 nodes in the flow direction and 62 nodes in the orthogonal direction.…”
Section: Mesh and Numerical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption have been studied in (Goncalves and Decaix, 2012) and comparisons were proposed with a thin boundary layer approach.…”
Section: Wall Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%