2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12264-018-0278-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wandering Minds with Wandering Brain Networks

Abstract: The default mode network (DMN) is associated with the occurrence of mind-wandering or task-unrelated thought. In contrast, the frontal-parietal network (FPN) and visual network (VS) are involved in tasks with external stimuli. However, it is not clear how these functional network interactions support these two different processes - mind-wandering and on-task - especially with regard to individual variation in the mind-wandering experience. In this study, we investigated the functional connectivity and modular … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding might be related to previous empirical demonstration that transcranial direct current stimulation of the DLPFC (1) modulates functional connectivity within DMN components 44,45 , and (2) increases the propensity to mind wander 46,47 (although debated, see Ref. 48 ), a brain state during which DMN activity is particularly high 49,50 . Activity within nodes of the executive control network might therefore modulate the dynamic stability of the posterior DMN, but future studies in larger groups of participants are mandatory to confirm that statement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This finding might be related to previous empirical demonstration that transcranial direct current stimulation of the DLPFC (1) modulates functional connectivity within DMN components 44,45 , and (2) increases the propensity to mind wander 46,47 (although debated, see Ref. 48 ), a brain state during which DMN activity is particularly high 49,50 . Activity within nodes of the executive control network might therefore modulate the dynamic stability of the posterior DMN, but future studies in larger groups of participants are mandatory to confirm that statement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In this contextual framework, DMN engagement reflects “relaxation” of attentional foci to facilitate mental shifts. Network activation at rest, particularly during mind-wandering, would be explained by ongoing shifts in thought processes and their mental context (Kucyi and Davis, 2014; Mittner et al, 2016; Zhou and Lei, 2018). The existence of distinct subsystems within human DMN provides strong support for functional specialization within this network that may dually subserve contextual encoding (dorsal stream) and introspective processing (ventral stream).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early fMRI research (without tDCS) demonstrated that the SART used with interspersed thought-probes successfully activated the DMN during reported episodes of ‘off-task’ and the ECN for ‘on-task’ responses 18,23 . However, subsequent research using the same design was unable to replicate this 24 or used independent component analysis (ICA) to identify networks of interests instead 54 . Our results are in line with this and may suggest a lack of power to reliably identify the regions of interest in the GLM analyses, but also may highlight the unreliability of participant self-reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%